摘要：The aim of this text is to examine some basic characteristics of Arne Neass’ philosophical concept,examines their connection with the authors’ personality and selected outlines of historical development of European culture in the first half of 20th century and prove the philosophical grounds upon which Arne Neass’ deep ecology stands preexisted independently of Neass.It endeavors to refer to certain inconsistent tendencies of Neasses´ ecosophy T.Therefore the text is a direct polemic with the Neass’ interpretation of deep ecology in the writings of leading Czech environmentalist professor Hana Librová and professor Erazim Kohák.After the historic-psychological discussion of the genealogy of Arne Neass’ philosophical opinions,the focal point of argumentation shifts to the analysis of a selection of Neass’ texts.In total three studies of the ontological recourses and mental maps of Neass’ texts prove his deep ecology consists of two very contradictory tendencies: a humanistic and enlightenment tendency and the tendency of the emotionally and religiously antirational.
其他摘要：Druhá část textu,který zkoumá základní charakteristiky filosofického konceptu Arne Naesse,přibližuje jejich spojitost s osobností autora i vybranými rysy historického vývoje evropské kultury první poloviny 20.století a snaží se poukázat na jisté rozporuplné tendence Naessovy ekosofie T.
