摘要：This article gives an overview of general condition and certain perspectives of qualification of criminal offences and its theory in relation to the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice. It must be admitted,that in terms of the needs of qualification,the abundant jurisprudence of the Court of Justice remains scattered,unpurified,not systematized,therefore insufficiently known,while clearly having a legal potential,significant to perception and application of qualification rules. It is especially visible regarding those standards of qualification which are extracted while combining the rules of national and EU law. Namely because of them,national courts usually refer the preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice and get the needed answers. This article follows the original idea that selection of jurisprudence,organization and presentation may be started by using examples of the rulings of the Court of Justice that illustrate the most important features of qualification as a legal phenomenon. Thus in the beginning the most important,principal structural components of qualification are described,without which at least the so called official qualification is not possible. There are several of them. Firstly,it is socially detrimental offences,without which there is nothing to qualify. Another component – the legal standards,applied while qualifying,by the way,not restricted to the elements of criminal offences,but also including the categories of crimes. Then the subjects,which must or may take operations of qualification,and finally the so called imperative of qualification,describing cases in which qualifying is simply obligatory,in which qualifying is possible depending on circumstances and in which it is prohibited to undertake the qualification actions. In this order a dozen respectively grouped examples of jurisprudence of the Court of Justice are given,which illustrate the possibility to elaborate on the mentioned components of qualification: offences,the standards of their legal evaluation,the subjects engaging in qualification and their obligations and possibilities. For example,common attitude of this Court towards qualification is expressed in Cresson case. The object of a crime is commented in a Lithuanian-originated Babanov case. The terms “the same offense”,“the same facts” are elucidated in the rulings of Mantello and Gasparini e.a. cases. The matter of culpability is commented in Afrasiabi e.a. case,the matter of application of more favourable criminal law – in Paoletti e.a. case. And this is not an exhaustive list of the Court’s judgements significant to qualification. Elucidations on many other matters can be found in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice,elaborating on the rules of qualification and conditions of their application. This initial analysis of the raised problems,and especially its further development,may be useful for both practice of qualification of criminal offences,as well as its theory.
其他摘要：Straipsnyje1 apžvelgiama nusikalstamų veikų kvalifikavimo ir jo teorijos santykio su ES Teisingumo Teismo atitinkama jurisprudencija būklė ir perspektyvos. Lietuvos teisės moksle ši problematika kol kas nebuvo tirta. Pirmasis žvilgsnis į ją rodo,kad kvalifikavimo reikmių požiūriu Teisingumo Teismo jurisprudencija lieka išsklaidyta ir nepakankamai žinoma,nors turi akivaizdaus teisinio potencialo,reikšmingo kvalifikavimo taisyklėms suvokti ir taikyti. Tai ypač matyti kalbant apie kvalifikavimo standartus,gaunamus derinant nacionalinės ir ES teisės nuostatas. Išsakoma originali idėja,kad jurisprudencijos atranka,sisteminimas ir pristatymas gali būti pradėti pasinaudojant Teisingumo Teismo sprendimų pavyzdžiais,iliustruojančiais svarbiausias kvalifikavimo kaip teisinio reiškinio savybes. Pateikiama keliolika atitinkamai sugrupuotų jurisprudencijos pavyzdžių,kurie leidžia patikslinti principinius kvalifikavimo komponentus: veikas,jų teisinio vertinimo standartus,kvalifikavimą atliekančius subjektus,jų kompetenciją,taip pat kvalifikavimo operacijų inicijavimo ar draudimo jas atlikti teisines ištakas. Ši pirminė analizė,o dar labiau jos tolesnis plėtojimas gali būti naudingi tiek nusikalstamų veikų kvalifikavimo praktikai,tiek jo teorijai. L‘article donne un aperçu de l‘état et des perspectives des liens entre,d‘une part,la qualification des actes criminels,ainsi que de sa théorie et,d‘autre part,la jurisprudence pertinente de la Cour de Justice de l‘UE. Dans la doctrine juridique lituanienne,une telle problématique n‘a pas encore été abordée. Après un premier examen,sous l‘angle des besoins de la qualification,cette jurisprudence se présente comme dispersée et relativement mal connue,bien qu‘elle contienne un potentiel juridique évident et utile pour la compréhension et l‘application des règles normatives utilisées lors des opérations de qualification. C‘est encore plus probant s’agissant des standards de qualification,lesquels se constituent sur la base des principes et des normes tant communautaires que nationales. Alors,on part de l‘idée que les premières sélection,systématisation et présentation de la jurisprudence en question peuvent être réalisées à travers des exemples choisis de décisions de la Cour de Justice,lesquelles illustrent les facettes principales de ce phénomène juridique,notamment la qualification en matière pénale. Cet article présente quatorze exemples,caractérisant les composantes principales de cette activité: les faits à qualifier; les standards juridiques applicables (incriminations,catégories); les auteurs du travail de qualification; les origines légales de la mission à qualifier qui englobent toute la panoplie des obligations,des possibilités et des obstacles pour ce travail. Cette première analyse,et encore plus son éventuelle poursuite,peuvent apporter de sérieux avantages en faveur de la pratique et de la doctrine de qualification en matière pénale.
