摘要：The article analyzes John McTaggart’s argument for unreality of time,a classical piece of fin de siècle Brittish idealist metaphysics.Having accepted the distinction between A-series and B-series,one can only resist McTaggartian conclusion by denying at least one of the two: that B-series alone is insufficient for change or that A-series implies a contradiction.Hugh Mellor’s criticism is taken to represent this strategy.The lesson to be learnt from this debate is that if the world is conceived as a mere totality of facts no change could be real in such a world,and so McTaggart would right.However,if the reality of things determining those facts is recognized as more fundamental,it would not be denied that at least some of these things undergo genuine temporal change,and time as a dimension of this real change cannot be rejected.
