出版社:Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)
摘要:The article expands upon applying the method of interviewing in collecting language data.The article distinguishes between several types of linguistic data,describes the collecting of language material as a process and various factors in uencing that process.The article describes different aspects of collecting material by way of interviews,revealing some contrary aspects of the interview as a method.On the one hand the interviewing process is systematic, exible,and as a method,it can be applied quite easily,permitting the investigator to reach its purpose quickly;on the other hand there is no guarantee for a perfectly planned and structured interview to meet its purpose if the interviewer does not take into consideration the possible side-effects,for example the observer’s paradox,mutual in uence,(sub)conscious changes in the language behaviour,which appear in the oral language use of the speaker.Whatever the material resulting from an interview it takes shape as a result of collaboration between two parties,which,in turn,is coordinated by the situation of the conversation and its aspects.
其他摘要:Keelekasutuse uuringutes tuntakse erinevaid ainestikutüüpe,nagu intervjuu,argivestlused,osalusvaatlustel põhinevad ainestikud,päevikumärkmed,ankeetküsitlused,eksperimendid,kirjalikud tekstid,autobiograa ad,helimaterjalid,raadio- ja telesaated,e-kirjad jne.Tõenäoliselt nõustub iga empiirilise ainestikuga töötav uurija väitega,et ideaalset keeleandmete kogumise meetodit ei ole olemas.Artiklis käsitletakse intervjueerimise ja intervjuuainestike spetsii kat keeleuuringute eesmärkidest ja vajadustest lähtuvalt.Vaadeldakse selliseid empiiriliste uuringute põhiprobleeme nagu vaatleja paradoks,intervjueerija ja intervjueeritava suhe ja koostöö ning nende vastastikune mõjutamine.Nimetatud aspektid on tegurid,millest oleneb keeleandmete kogumise edukus.