期刊名称：Collected papers of the faculy of law in Split
印刷版ISSN：0584-9063
电子版ISSN：1874-0459
出版年度：2020
卷号：57
期号：3
页码：899-909
DOI：10.31141/zrpfs.2020.57.137.899
出版社：Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu
摘要：In this text, the authors analize one decision of the Sports Arbitration Council of the HOO, that they consider inadmissible both formally and substantively. They consider the form to be completely unacceptable for such an important decision (which is to administratively prevent the accomplishment of entry into the higher ranking of competitions made on the playing field) to be made to the extent of (substantively) less than two pages. In substance, the application of the rules of interpretation was omitted, that is, it was acted as if the target interpretation (as absolutely accepted and favored in the EU) didn’t matter exist at all or (if it did) it didn’t matter.
关键词：arbitration; interpretation; legal equality; legal certainty; rule of law
