首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月06日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Differentiation between wild and artificial cultivated Stephaniae tetrandrae radix using chromatographic and flow‐injection mass spectrometric fingerprints with the aid of principal component analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ya‐dong Qin ; Feng‐man Fang ; Rong‐bin Wang
  • 期刊名称:Food Science & Nutrition
  • 电子版ISSN:2048-7177
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:8
  • 期号:8
  • 页码:4223-4231
  • DOI:10.1002/fsn3.1717
  • 出版社:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • 摘要:High‐performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) and flow‐injection mass spectrometric (FIMS) fingerprinting profiles were used to differentiate between wild and artificial cultivated Stephaniae tetrandrae Radix samples. HPLC and FIMS fingerprints of 15 wild S. tetrandrae Radix samples and 12 artificial cultivated S. tetrandrae Radix samples were obtained and analyzed with the aid of principal component analysis (PCA). PCA of the fingerprints showed that the chemical differences between wild and artificial cultivated S. tetrandrae Radix samples could be differentiated by either HPLC or FIMS fingerprints. The HPLC fingerprints provided more chemical information but required longer analytical time compared with FIMS fingerprints. This study indicated that the wild samples contained higher concentrations of almost all of the major compounds than the cultivated samples. Three characteristic compounds which were responsible for the differences between the samples were tentatively identified with the aid of MS data. Furthermore, these three compounds, tetrandrine (TET), fangchinoline (FAN), and cyclanoline (CYC), were quantified. The HPLC and FIMS fingerprints combined with PCA could be used for quality assessment of wild and artificial cultivated S. tetrandrae Radix samples.
  • 关键词:chromatographic;flow‐injection mass spectrometric;principal component analysis;Stephaniae tetrandrae radix
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有