首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月26日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:What Defines a Conceptual Resource?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang
  • 期刊名称:Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
  • 电子版ISSN:2330-4014
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:6
  • 页码:143-167
  • DOI:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.006
  • 出版社:Michigan Publishing
  • 摘要:In recent social philosophical investigation, many theorists have relied on the idea that our social and epistemic dispositions depend on collective access to a shared set of concepts, or what I call a conceptual resource. What is not said in this literature is how such conceptual resources are individuated. To address this, I propose and provide an answer to The Resource Question : What is the relationship that must hold in order for a set of concepts to be the conceptual resource of a group of people? This question implies that a conceptual resource is not defined simply by the concepts that constitute it, nor solely by the group that it is attributed to. Instead, it is defined by a relationship between groups of people and sets of concepts. After surveying some possible answers, I settle on Communication : social agents must be able to use concepts in patterned interactions of communication. This answer controverts the intuitive position that social groups are bearers of conceptual resources. I argue that conceptual resources are only indirectly related to social groups.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有