摘要：The need to involve the public and stakeholders in decision-making around issues of technological complexity and conflicting values and knowledge systems is widely accepted in the field of natural resources management.Addressing both analysis and deliberation, analytic-deliberative processes are increasingly used for complex decision contexts.Yet, there remain significant disagreements about best practices for what constitutes a successful engagement process, be it analytic-deliberative, or otherwise.In response, theoretical frameworks and guidelines have been proposed to inform the design and evaluation of participatory engagement processes broadly.A common critique, however, is that the complexity and inflexibility of existing frameworks can make them inaccessible or impractical for natural resources managers and practitioners to use.Here, we propose a simple yet comprehensive framework for the design and evaluation of analytic-deliberative processes.We trial this framework in the context of an engagement process involving stakeholders and Indigenous peoples across the Canadian province of British Columbia on topics relating to forest carbon mitigation.Our recommendations highlight the importance of involving multiple actors, views and worldviews.We also emphasize the importance of inclusive deliberation that is based on the best available science, but also on other forms of expertise, including lay and traditional knowledge.Perhaps most importantly, our recommendations are consistent with others who call for opening-up analysis, deliberation and appraisal in participatory engagement.This means acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all solution does not always exist, but rather that plural and conditional policy options are often more advised in the context of complex environmental issues.
