首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月08日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:El consenso sobre el origen humano del cambio del clima no ha sido demostrado aún
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:J.C. González-Hidalgo
  • 期刊名称:Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica = Geographical Research Letters
  • 印刷版ISSN:0211-6820
  • 电子版ISSN:1697-9540
  • 出版年度:2018
  • 卷号:44
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:349-375
  • DOI:10.18172/cig.3368
  • 出版社:Universidad de La Rioja
  • 摘要:During the last three decades two new paradigms have emerged. The first one in the called “Climate Change”, and the second, that could be named scientific-social paradigm, and referred to the previous, is the consensus that climate change has been produced by human emissions.In this paper, after a brief presentation of the first paradigm following the main conclusions of IPCC, the author reviews the main documents from which the second one has been stated. It is not the aim of this paper to argue or discuss the climate change and its attribution, but how the consensus has been achieved, because the consensus on the attribution of climate change is apparent, since it cannot be concluded from the aforementioned text.The review of the most well-known and quoted papers in scientific, political, cultural, and mass media, shows that 97% magnitude of consensus is not related to the original data, it has been calculated from partial slanted and biased information, and is referred to the opinion of a small number of people. With caution, the most real agreement from the data published until present should be approximately 50%.Temperature has risen from the beginning of surface observations, but there is not necessary any consensus to support this empirical fact. Meanwhile, to attribute that greenhouse gases emission is the most relevant factor based on majority or authority principles is not scientifically correct, because no one polling has been proof of true.
  • 关键词:climate change; consensus; science; majority; post-truth
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有