出版社：Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
摘要：Pričujoči članek analizira pripovedno strukturo romana Pepita Jiménez, prvega in najboljšega dela španskega pisatelja Juana Valere, ter posebnosti njegovega domnevnega (fiktivnega) urednika. Leta 1872 objavljeni pisemski roman kaže številne poteze zlasti francoskih in britanskih predhodnikov iz 18. stoletja. Čeprav je njegov začetek dokaj arhetipski, pa to delo, ki je kljub zapleteni zgradbi in petim pripovedovalcem presenetljivo neobsežno, razkriva edinstveno figuro ekstradiegetičnega pripovedovalca-fiktivnega urednika, ki ni le napisal (literarnega) predgovora, temveč je tudi večkrat posegel v pripoved. Vrh vsega so njegovi komentarji pogosto v protislovju z njegovim lastnim predgovorom, katerega glavni namen je (bil) zajamčiti avtentičnost pisem in verodostojnost pripovedi. Avtor skozi aplikacijo Genettove teorije o pripovedovalcu (Figures III, 1972) ter paratekstu (Seuils, 1987) dokaže, da v tem primeru bistvo urednikove prefacialne in ekstradiegetične vloge v prvi vrsti ni avtentifikacija, pač pa usmerjanje pozornosti na proces avtentifikacije, ter da vprašanje verodostojnosti v romanu nikakor ni dialektične narave.
其他摘要：The present article analyses the narrative structure of Spanish author Juan Valera's first and best novel, Pepita Jiménez, and specificities regarding its alleged (fictional) “editor”. Published in 1872, this epistolary work shows numerous traits of its eighteenth-century predecessors, namely French and British. However archetypical in the beginning, the novel, surprisingly short for having a complex structure of five narrative voices, reveals a unique figure of extradiegetic narrator – fictional editor, who not only wrote a (fictional) preface but also intervened in the narrative discourse on various occasions. Moreover, his comments often contradict his own preface which has (had) one major function: to assure the letters’ authenticity and the veracity of discourse. The author applies Genette’s theory of narrative voices (Figures III, 1972) and paratexts (Seuils, 1987) to prove that the editor’s preface and extradiegetic role is not so much to authenticate as to underline the process of authentication, and that in this case, the question of veracity is by no means dialectical.
关键词：naratologija; pisemski roman; paratekst; Pepita Jiménez; Juan Valera
其他关键词：narratology; epistolary novel; paratext; Pepita Jiménez; Juan Valera
