出版社：Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
摘要：Za poezijo Matíasa Escalere Cordera so značilni dolgi verzi; je prepletena, razmišljujoča in hkrati vabi k razmisleku, zaveda se svoje zgodovinskosti ter želja in namenov, in razpolaga s kompleksno mrežo filozofskih povezav in napetosti. Zato se de facto zoperstavlja lahkotnemu, površinskemu dojemanju življenja, ki nam ga privzgaja današnja družba. Popolnoma jo artikulirata eksplicitna dialoškost in dvojnost, ki kažeta na dialektiko. Gre za poezijo, ki kaže zanimivo preplastitev glasov, spremljajo pa jo nenehni skladenjski premori, ki kot nekakšni vrivki naznanjajo vnovično prebiranje že napisanega, ki zapisano dopolnjujejo, precizirajo, razvijajo ali celo prerekajo, skozi dialog, in vselej razširjajo. Tako se v besedilu pokažeta dve ravni ubesedovanja, ki se stečeta v neenoten pogled na označeno in na znake, na celotni kontekst, kar doprinese zelo jasno filozofsko in politično stališče, saj terja raznolikost in stalno kontrastiranje kot nekaj nujnega za razumevanje resničnosti. Skratka, služi nam kot orodje radikalnega pogleda, ta naj preseže navidezno, si dovoli razkriti vezi med dogodki, osebami, onstran oddaljenosti, prek katere izmuzljivi moderni čas gradi sedanjost
其他摘要：Matias Escalera Corderos poetry is characterised by long verses; it is typically involved, deeply reflective and thought-provoking; it is aware of its own temporality, desires and intentions and presents a complex web of philosophical interconnections and tensions. It stands in contrast to the straight forward, superficial perception of life which contemporary society imparts to us. The poetry articulates an explicit dialogocity and duality, a dialectic indeed. This is poetry which presents an interesting juxtaposition of voices borne by constant, syntactic syncopations, like inserts which reannounce what has already been written and improvise on it, elaborating on it, correcting it, putting it more precisely, developing or even contradicting it, engaging in a conversation with it, forever expanding it. Thus, there are two levels of enunciation in the text, which converge in a somewhat incongruous perspective on the text and context, but which nevertheless leads to a very clear philosophical and political standpoint, one which pleads for heterogeneity and permanent contrastas a prequisite for understanding reality. In short, it provides us with the tools to take a fresh look at reality, which goes beyond appearances and whichseeks to reveal the deeper connections that tie events and people beyond the apparent remoteness of the present as shaped by our elusive modernity.
