首页    期刊浏览 2025年12月25日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Artistic Research: Delusions, Confusions and Differentiations
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Josef Früchtl
  • 期刊名称:Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
  • 电子版ISSN:2544-302X
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:3
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:124-134
  • DOI:10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0022
  • 出版社:Institute of Philosophy, University of Warsaw
  • 摘要:Concerning artistic research, the state of affairs is still one of delusions and confusions. The reason for this is the pluralization and dedifferentiation of rationality pushed forward by the postmodern period. The way out of it is the way of differentiations. Thus, it seems helpful, first, to remember what we already have in philosophical aesthetics, namely four basic models of art and knowledge. The question, then, is whether artistic research fits into (one of) these models. To my mind, it does – though in a new way. Secondly, it is helpful to have a short sober sociological look at the situation. Finally, we have to ask the question about the kind of research that is at stake in artistic research. Here, the meaning of non-propositional knowledge and Kant’s idea of an as-if-knowledge is useful. All in all, artistic research still fails in giving a sufficient explanation of itself.
  • 关键词:artistic research; philosophical aesthetics; non-propositional knowledge; Kant
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有