摘要：The purpose of this study is to formulate a law enforcement mallpractice through appropriate penal mediation approach and provide a win-win solution for the parties involved in the dispute medik.Target khususya that identify, inventory provisions regulating medical mallpraktek in Indonesia. The method used in this paper is a normative juridical method is done by researching library materials or so-called secondary data in the form of positive law. Results showed Forms discussion increasingly complex medical disputes require a model solution that is able to unravel the problems with wider, komprehenship and flexible with the disputing parties involved in the decision-making process; (b) Being able to reduce the number of medical disputes are resolved through litigation / court, so as to reduce the buildup of this case in the courts. Through the Institute of Medical Dispute Resolution will be able to generate trust and eventually will be the choice of the patient to resolve the dispute with the doctor / dentist / health care facilities; (c) Ability to address complaints of patients / families in obtaining protection, although the settlement of disputes are not necessarily able to satisfy it. However, the existence of these models are expected to provide a solution for both patients and health professionals in solving medical problems, without having to involve a lot of people who are not interested.
其他摘要：Abstract The purpose of this study is to formulate a law enforcement mallpractice through appropriate penal mediation approach and provide a win-win solution for the parties involved in the dispute medik.Target khususya that identify, inventory provisions regulating medical mallpraktek in Indonesia. The method used in this paper is a normative juridical method is done by researching library materials or so-called secondary data in the form of positive law. Results showed Forms discussion increasingly complex medical disputes require a model solution that is able to unravel the problems with wider, komprehenship and flexible with the disputing parties involved in the decision-making process; (b) Being able to reduce the number of medical disputes are resolved through litigation / court, so as to reduce the buildup of this case in the courts. Through the Institute of Medical Dispute Resolution will be able to generate trust and eventually will be the choice of the patient to resolve the dispute with the doctor / dentist / health care facilities; (c) Ability to address complaints of patients / families in obtaining protection, although the settlement of disputes are not necessarily able to satisfy it. However, the existence of these models are expected to provide a solution for both patients and health professionals in solving medical problems, without having to involve a lot of people who are not interested
