摘要：OBJECTIVES This study established the relationship and reliability of vertical jump height measurements
using both the jump-reach method and the flight-time method.
METHODS Sixteen healthy subjects (13 males and 3 females, body mass index: 22.5 kg/m2
) visited the
laboratory twice with at least two days between visits. During each visit, they performed three successful
trials of one- and two-legged maximal vertical jumps on a Vertec jump tester (the jump-reach method).
Simultaneously, two digital cameras were videotaped, one for a whole body view and another for a view
of the feet (240 frame rate and 1/1000 s shutter speed). Flight-times were measured using a free motion
analysis software (Kinovea 0.8.15) and were then inserted into the formula h = t2
× 122.625 to calculate
the height. To determine if the jump values from each method were correlated, average values from the
three trials for both jump methods were analyzed using Pearson correlation and simple linear regression
tests. To establish a within- and between-session reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)
were calculated.
RESULTS Assessed vertical jump heights using the two methods were highly correlated with each other (r
values ranged between 0.86 and 0.93 with p<0.0001 for all tests) and showed high reliability (ICC values
ranged between 0.73 and 0.99 for all tests).
CONCLUSIONS Vertical jump heights assessed by the two field tests were highly correlated and consistent.
Although the flight-time method calculates less jump heights, the underestimated amount can be estimated
by the established equations. We suggest that athletes and coaches use either technique in the field in
consideration of advantages for each method.
