首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Case Note—Judgment of theBundesgerichtshof(Federal Court of Justice of Germany) of 22 March 2011: Passion to Inform—BGH Expands Banks' Advisory Duties
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Jean David Jansen
  • 期刊名称:German Law Journal
  • 电子版ISSN:2071-8322
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:7
  • 页码:1492-1509
  • DOI:10.1017/S2071832200017405
  • 出版社:Cambridge University Press
  • 摘要:In February 2011, a Bundesgerichtshof [BGH—Federal Court of Justice] decision caused a great media echo. The court convicted Germany's largest bank to pay about half a million Euros in damages for the breach of advisory duties. In the aftermath of the financial crisis, banking law evolved fast in German courts. The recent decision raises new questions concerning the advisory duties of a bank, when offering financial products to its clients. The article gives an insight to various factual backgrounds, which, as financial products of today, are somewhat complex. Another interesting aspect to this case is that there are numerous decisions of lower courts that dealt with the same product as the BGH did. The ruling is considered to be far-reaching and groundbreaking. This case note will look into the question how far this is true.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有