首页    期刊浏览 2025年07月28日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Value-added Norms, Local Litigation, and Global Enforcement: Why the Brussels-Philosophy failed in The Hague
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Gralf-Peter Calliess
  • 期刊名称:German Law Journal
  • 电子版ISSN:2071-8322
  • 出版年度:2004
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:12
  • 页码:1489-1498
  • DOI:10.1017/S2071832200013365
  • 出版社:Cambridge University Press
  • 摘要:In the early Nineties the Hague Conference on International Private Law on initiative of the United States started negotiations on a Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (the “ Hague Convention “). In October 1999 the Special Commission on duty presented a preliminary text, which was drafted quite closely to the European Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (the “ Brussels Convention “). The latter was concluded between the then 6 Member States of the EEC in Brussels in 1968 and amended several times on occasion of the entry of new Member States. In 2000, after the Treaty of Amsterdam altered the legal basis for judicial co-operation in civil matters in Europe, it was transformed into an EC Regulation (the “Brussels I Regulation”).
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有