首页    期刊浏览 2024年09月01日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Randomized Polynomial-Time Equivalence Between Determinant and Trace-IMM Equivalence Tests
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Janaky Murthy ; Vineet Nair ; Chandan Saha
  • 期刊名称:LIPIcs : Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
  • 电子版ISSN:1868-8969
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:170
  • 页码:72:1-72:16
  • DOI:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.72
  • 出版社:Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik
  • 摘要:Equivalence testing for a polynomial family {g_m}_{m â^^ â".} over a field ð"½ is the following problem: Given black-box access to an n-variate polynomial f({𝐱}), where n is the number of variables in g_m for some m â^^ â"., check if there exists an A â^^ GL(n,ð"½) such that f({𝐱}) = g_m(A{𝐱}). If yes, then output such an A. The complexity of equivalence testing has been studied for a number of important polynomial families, including the determinant (Det) and the family of iterated matrix multiplication polynomials. Two popular variants of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial are: IMM_{w,d} (the (1,1) entry of the product of d many wÃ- w symbolic matrices) and Tr-IMM_{w,d} (the trace of the product of d many wÃ- w symbolic matrices). The families - Det, IMM and Tr-IMM - are VBP-complete under p-projections, and so, in this sense, they have the same complexity. But, do they have the same equivalence testing complexity? We show that the answer is "yes" for Det and Tr-IMM (modulo the use of randomness). The above result may appear a bit surprising as the complexity of equivalence testing for IMM and that for Det are quite different over â"S: a randomized poly-time equivalence testing for IMM over â"S is known [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2019], whereas [Ankit Garg et al., 2019] showed that equivalence testing for Det over â"S is integer factoring hard (under randomized reductions and assuming GRH). To our knowledge, the complexity of equivalence testing for Tr-IMM was not known before this work. We show that, despite the syntactic similarity between IMM and Tr-IMM, equivalence testing for Tr-IMM and that for Det are randomized poly-time Turing reducible to each other over any field of characteristic zero or sufficiently large. The result is obtained by connecting the two problems via another well-studied problem in computer algebra, namely the full matrix algebra isomorphism problem (FMAI). In particular, we prove the following: 1) Testing equivalence of polynomials to Tr-IMM_{w,d}, for d ≥ 3 and w ≥ 2, is randomized polynomial-time Turing reducible to testing equivalence of polynomials to Det_w, the determinant of the w Ã- w matrix of formal variables. (Here, d need not be a constant.) 2) FMAI is randomized polynomial-time Turing reducible to equivalence testing (in fact, to tensor isomorphism testing) for the family of matrix multiplication tensors {Tr-IMM_{w,3}}_{w â^^ â".}. These results, in conjunction with the randomized poly-time reduction (shown in [Ankit Garg et al., 2019]) from determinant equivalence testing to FMAI, imply that the four problems - FMAI, equivalence testing for Tr-IMM and for Det, and the 3-tensor isomorphism problem for the family of matrix multiplication tensors - are randomized poly-time equivalent under Turing reductions.
  • 关键词:equivalence testing; determinant; trace of the matrix product; full-matrix algebra isomorphism
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有