期刊名称：Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte
印刷版ISSN：1692-8857
电子版ISSN：2011-7477
出版年度：2020
期号：32
页码：1-23
DOI：10.14482/eidos.32.193
出版社：Universidad del Norte
摘要：This paper analyses the features of Kant’s view of memory, which Kant himself described explicitly in his lectures on anthropology and implicitly in the A edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. I shall offer a review of literature on Kant’s view of memory up to this day. I suggest that memory is a cognitive faculty that has the power to store and reproduce representations. Kant distinguishes among three different kinds of memorization which are relevant for human cognition. I offer reasons to hold that imagination and memory must be differentiated by their functioning, although the first one grounds the second one. Finally, I hold that certain functions of memory need to be presupposed at a transcendental level, in which memory would play a fundamental function with regard to the possibility of experience.
