标题：UPPER LIMB NEURODYNAMIC BILATERAL LEBIH MENURUNKAN SKOR NYERI DAN TENSION NERVUS MEDIANUS DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN UPPER LIMB NEURODYNAMIC IPSILATERAL PADA PENDERITA CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY
其他标题：UPPER LIMB NEURODYNAMIC BILATERAL LEBIH MENURUNKAN SKOR NYERI DAN TENSION NERVUS MEDIANUS DIBANDINGKAN DENGAN UPPER LIMB NEURODYNAMIC IPSILATERAL PADA PENDERITA CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY
摘要：Pendahuluan: Cervical radiculopathy merupakan suatu kondisi klinis dimana terjadinya kompresi pada akar saraf yang menyebabkan perubahan fisiologis pada jaringan saraf. Tujuan Penelitian: membuktikan upper limb neurodynamic bilateral lebih menurunkan nyeri, meningkatkan range of motion (ROM) cervical, dan ekstensi elbow pada penderita cervical radiculopathy jika dibandingkan dengan neurodynamic ipsilateral. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan rancangan pre dan post-test control group design menggunakan 24 orang sampel yang dibagi ke dalam 2 kelompok. Pada Kelompok 1 diberikan upper limb neurodynamic ipsilateral sedangkan Kelompok 2 diberikan intervensi upper limb neurodynamic bilateral. Intervensi diberikan sebanyak 12 kali. Pengukuran skor nyeri menggunakan numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) dan ROM cervical menggunakan goniometer dan tension nervus medianus diukur melalui ROM ekstensi elbow. Hasil: Perbedaan yang bermakna antara kedua kelompok didapatkan pada pengukuran skor nyeri dengan nilai p = 0,000 (p 0,05). Kesimpulan: upper limb neurodynamic bilateral lebih menurunkan skor nyeri dan menurunkan tension nervus medianus dibandingkan dengan upper limb neurodynamic ipsilateral dan tidak lebih meningkatkan ROM cervical pada penderita cervical radiculopathy .
其他摘要：Introduction: Cervical radiculopathy is a clinical condition in which compression of the nerve roots causes physiological changes in nerve tissue. Objective: To prove bilateral neurodynamic upper limb reduces pain, increases cervical range of motion (ROM), and elbow extension in patients with cervical radiculopathy when compared with ipsilateral neurodynamic. Method: This study was an experimental study with a pre and post-test control group design using 24 samples divided into 2 groups. In Group 1, ipsilateral upper limb neurodynamic was given while Group 2 was given bilateral upper limb neurodynamic. Interventions were given 12 times. Measurement of pain scores using the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) and cervical ROM using a goniometer while median nerve tension was measured by ROM of elbow extension. Results: Significant differences between the two groups were obtained in the measurement of pain scores with p = 0,000 (p 0,05). Conclusion: bilateral upper limb neurodynamic is better in decreasing pain scores and median nerve tension compared with ipsilateral upper limb neurodynamic, but is not better in improving cervical ROM in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
关键词：nyeri, ROM cervical, ROM ekstensi elbow, neurodynamic ipsilateral, neurodynamic bilateral, cervical radiculopathy
