首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Welfare of pigs during killing for purposes other than slaughter
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Søren Saxmose Nielsen ; Julio Alvarez ; Dominique Joseph Bicout
  • 期刊名称:EFSA Journal
  • 印刷版ISSN:1831-4732
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:18
  • 期号:7
  • 页码:1-72
  • DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6195
  • 出版社:European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma
  • 摘要:Pigs at different stages of the production cycle may have to be killed on‐farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually (e.g. severely injured pigs) or on a large scale (e.g. unproductive animals or for disease control reasons). This opinion assessed the risks associated with the on‐farm killing of pigs and included two phases: 1) handling and moving of pigs and 2) killing methods (including restraint). The killing methods were subdivided into four categories: electrical methods, mechanical methods, gas mixture methods and lethal injection. Four welfare consequences to which pigs can be exposed to during on‐farm killing were identified: pain, fear, impeded movement and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal‐based measures were described. In total, 28 hazards were associated with the welfare consequences; majority of the hazards (24) are related to Phase 2 (killing). The main hazards are associated with lack of staff skills and training, and poor‐designed and constructed facilities. Staff was identified as an origin of all hazards, either due to lack of skills needed to perform appropriate killing or due to fatigue. Corrective measures were identified for 25 hazards. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal‐based measures, hazard origins, preventive and corrective measures were developed and mitigation measures proposed.
  • 关键词:pigs;on‐farm killing;hazards;animal welfare consequences;animal‐based measures;preventive/corrective measures
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有