期刊名称：Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones
印刷版ISSN：1576-5962
电子版ISSN：2174-0534
出版年度：2020
卷号：36
期号：3
页码：215-222
DOI：10.5093/jwop2020a17
出版社：Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid
摘要：This research examines the convergent-discriminant and predictive validity of the Big Five personality dimensions assessed with two different formats of personality inventories: a single-stimulus (SS) and a quasi-ipsative forced-choice (FC). The relationship between both types of measures and intelligence (GMA) was also analyzed. The results showed that: (1) the SS and the quasi-ipsative FC measures present a high convergent-discriminant validity; (2) the Big Five personality dimensions, assessed with both questionnaires, and GMA are independent constructs; and (3) both types of personality measures have similar predictive validity for the three criteria examined (academic performance, training success, and interpersonal competence). As expected, conscientiousness was the best predictor of academic performance and training success. Extraversion was the best predictor of interpersonal competence. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
其他关键词：Los cinco grandes factores de personalidad; Cuestionario de elección forzosa quasiipsativo; Test de estímulo único; Inteligencia; Validez convergente y discriminante; Validez predictiva.
