期刊名称：International Journal of Industrial Distribution and Business
印刷版ISSN：2233-4165
电子版ISSN：2233-5382
出版年度：2020
卷号：11
期号：10
DOI：10.13106/jidb.2020.vol11.no10.75
语种：English
出版社：Korea Distribution Science Association
摘要：Purpose: The container terminal is an area that plays an important role in the country's import and export. As the volume of containers increased worldwide, competition between terminals became fiercer, and increasing the productivity of terminals became more important. Re handling is a serious obstacle that lowers the productivity of terminal. There are two ways to reduce re handling in the terminal yard. The first method is to load containers in terminal yards using effective carry in algorithms that reduce re handling. The second method is to carry out effective remarshalling. In this paper, the performance of various carry in algorithms and various remarshalling algorithms are reviewed. Next, we try to find the most effective combination of carry in algorithm and remarshalling algorithm. Research design, data and methodology: In this paper, we analyze the performance of the four carry in algorithms, AP, MDF, LVF, RP and the four remarshalling algorithms, ASI, ASI+, ASO, ASO+. And after making all the combinations of carry in algorithms and remarshalling algorithms, we compare their performance to find the best combination. To that end, many experiments are conducted with eight types of 100 bays through simulation. Results: The results of experiments showed that AP was effective among the carry in algorithms and ASO+ was effective among remarshalling algorithms. In the case of the LVF algorithm, the effect of carrying in was bad, but it was found to be effective in finding remarshalling solution. And we could see that ASI+ and ASO+, algorithms that carry out remarshalling even if they fail to find remarshalling solution, are also more effective than ASI and ASO. And among the combinations of carry in algorithms and remarshalling algorithms, we could see that the combination of AP algorithm and ASO+ algorithm was the most effective combination. Conclusion: We compared the performance of the carry in algorithms and the remarshalling algorithms and the performance of their combination. Since the performance of the container yard has a significant effect on the performance of the entire container terminal, it is believed that the results of this experiment will be effective in improving the performance of the container terminal when carrying in or when remarshalling.
