摘要：Purpose:Mechanistic case diagram (MCD) was recommended for increasing the depth of understanding of disease,but with few articles on its specific methods. We address the experience of making MCD in the fullest depth to identify the pros and cons of using MCDs in such ways. Methods:During problem-based learning,we gave guidelines of MCD for its mechanistic exploration from subcellular processes to clinical features,being laid out in as much detail as possible. To understand the students’ attitudes and depth of study using MCDs,we analyzed the results of a questionnaire in an open format about experiencing MCDs and examined the resulting products. Results:Through the responses to questionnaire,we found several favorable outcomes,major of which was deeper insight and comprehensive understanding of disease facilitated by the process of making well-organized diagram. The main disadvantages of these guidelines were the feeling of too much workload and difficulty of finding mechanisms. Students gave suggestions to overcome these problems:cautious reading of comprehensive texts,additional guidance from staff about depth and focus of mechanisms, and cooperative group work. From the analysis of maps,we recognized there should be allowance of diversities in the appearance of maps and many hypothetical connections,which could be related to an insufficient understanding of mechanisms in nature. Conclusion:The more detailed an MCD task is,the better students can become acquainted with deep knowledges. However, this advantage should be balanced by the results that there are many ensuing difficulties for the work and deliberate help plans should be prepared.
