首页    期刊浏览 2025年04月16日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:EU fiscal governance and budget consolidation in Visegrád countries
  • 其他标题:Фискальное регулирование ЕС и консолидация бюджета в странах Вишеградской группы
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Zhanna N. Komissarova ; Egor A. Sergeev
  • 期刊名称:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
  • 印刷版ISSN:2071-8160
  • 电子版ISSN:2541-9099
  • 出版年度:2019
  • 卷号:66
  • 期号:3
  • DOI:10.24833/2071-8160-2019-3-66-131-158
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:MGIMO University Press
  • 摘要:Budget consolidations in Visegrád countries,which followed European financial and debt crisis,were mainly driven by external factors such as EU fiscal governance. Since the Visegrád countries have accomplished their consolidation effort,it seems topical to study their experience and assess the efficiency of consolidation measures. Involving de scriptive statistical analysis,the authors posit that supranational impact on national budgets of Visegrád countries was quite efficient,as all economies concerned have accomplished a relatively sizeable fiscal consolidation. This happened largely due to the fact that the gov?ernments did not intend to lose vast amounts of funds from the EU budget. Such an op?tion was quite feasible as a part of possible sanctions related to excessive deficit. The Czech Republic,Hungary,Poland and the Slovak Republic run different consolidations as to scale, structure and measures taken,though one could highlight some similarities. On the one hand,consolidations were to a great extent carried out through the means of indirect taxation,because they have a less distortive nature,given the structural characteristics of coun?tries at issue. On the other hand,the governments refrained from raising direct taxes due to their distortive character. Hungary was the only country,which took some active measures in the field of corporate taxation,and subsequently suffered from drop in tax collection. The Visegrád countries did cut government expenditures,but strived to use the most effective instruments such as curbing employment in public sector. Further,there were some subsid?iary factors at place that influenced consolidation pace. For example,three of four Visegrád countries are not members of a currency union,which inter alia contributed to monetizing government debt. At the same time,some measures taken by the countries,were of a quite formal nature. For instance,Hungary totally nationalized pension system in order to increase budget revenues. Nevertheless,all Visegrád countries reached deficit target without any revolutionary changes to main fiscal aggregates,which means that consolidations were at least nominally effective. However,cumulative deficit change was not fully accompanied by lowering debt and was by several times less than cumulative transfers from the EU budget. At the same time the budget consolidations in Visegrád countries could be called efficient as GDP growth rates restored,as did investors’ confidence and exports.
  • 其他摘要:Посткризисные мероприятия по консолидации бюджетов в странах Вишеград- ской группы (Венгрии,Словакии,Польше и Чехии) отличались тем,что имели во многом вынужденный характер и были осуществлены под воздействием надна- ционального фискального регулирования
  • 关键词:budget deficit;fiscal policy;fiscal governance;budget consolidation;Growth and Stability Pact;Visegrád countries.
  • 其他关键词:дефицит бюджета;налогово-бюджетная политика;фискальное регули- рование;консолидация бюджета;Пакт стабильности и роста;Вишеградская группа
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有