摘要：Namen prispevka je prikazati, kako pravo EU, zlasti preko sodne prakse Sodišča EU, rešuje primere konflikta med enotnim trgom EU, ki predstavlja temeljno načelo prava EU, in prizadevanji držav članic po ohranitvi različnih jezikov, ki predstavljajo oviro za delovanje enotnega trga. Izpostavljen je zlasti vpliv tržnega prava EU na uporabo jezika pri prodaji blaga (bodisi v smislu oznak na proizvodih na trgovskih policah bodisi pri oglaševanju tega blaga v trgovinah in v medijih). Predstavljena je problematika zahtev po znanju jezika v okviru svobode gibanja delavcev, vključno s problematiko uporabe izvirnega imena v drugih državah članicah EU. Izpostavljena je tudi problematika vpliva skupne valute na jezikovno raznolikost držav članic. Utemeljevanje je podprto z uporabo uveljavljenih metod pravne znanosti. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how EU law, in particular throu.
其他摘要：The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how EU law, in particular through the case law of the EU Court of Justice, solves cases of conflict between the single market of the EU, which constitutes a fundamental aim of the EU, and the efforts of the Member States to maintain different languages, which constitute an obstacle to the functioning of the single market. The impact of the EU market in particular on the use of language in the sale of goods (either in terms of labels on the products displayed in stores, either in the advertising of the goods in stores and in the media) is pointed out. Moreover, the problem of language in the context of freedom of movement of workers, including the issue of the use of the original name in other EU Member States, is emphasised. Finally, the landmine problem of the common currency impact on the linguistic diversity of the Member States is discussed.
