标题：Who discusses: the paper or the author of the paper? Inanimate subject + active verb in Lithuanian linguistic discourse as compared to English
其他标题：Kas nagrinėja: straipsnis ar straipsnio autorius? Negyvas subjektas + aktyvų veiksmą reiš- kiantisveiksmažodislietuviškame lingvistiniame diskurse lyginant su anglišku
摘要：The paper sets out to examine the pattern ‘inanimate subject+active verb’ in Lithuanian linguistic discourse and compare it to the findings in the English linguistic discourse. The methodology of research involves frequency count of the pattern,identification of contexts as suggested by Master (2001) and interpretation of the pattern in the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In terms of frequency,there is no marked difference between English and Lithuanian academic discourse whereas the contexts are rather different. The metaphors identified within CMT have been largely the same,the most frequent including research is a person and research is a journey;however,their realisation has manifested cross-linguistic differences. In less frequent metaphors,Lithuanian seems to favour the research is (uncovering) a secret,research/writing is performance and research is a picture/painting metaphors whereas English gives slightly more preference to conceptualising language and research in terms of construction or building.
其他摘要：Straipsnyje nagrinėjama konstrukcija „negyvas subjektas + aktyvų veiksmą reiškiantis veiksma- žodis“ akademiniame diskurse (pvz.,straipsnis nagrinėja). Daugiausiai dėmesio skiriama lietuviškai medžiagai,o tyrimo rezultatai lyginami su panašaus tyrimo,atli
