摘要：In the “Internet ” era, conflicts of land requisition frequently occur. Existing research emphasizes the lack of systems but rarely considers the problems in the implementation of the system. Based on “Internet ”, this article adopts a case analysis method to discuss the governance of land requisition conflicts. This study analyzes the contradictions in the implementation of land acquisition, benefit distribution, procedures and information feedback. The dilemma of social governance stems from the “autonomous space”, “three-dimensional competition” and “independent space” of local governments. The innovation path of social governance needs to emphasize the supervision and regulation in the implementation of the system, the optimization of the system and the setting of the system and the flexible setting of the local field.
其他摘要：In the “Internet ” era, conflicts of land requisition frequently occur. Existing research emphasizes the lack of systems but rarely considers the problems in the implementation of the system. Based on “Internet ”, this article adopts a case analysis method to discuss the governance of land requisition conflicts. This study analyzes the contradictions in the implementation of land acquisition, benefit distribution, procedures and information feedback. The dilemma of social governance stems from the “autonomous space”, “three-dimensional competition” and “independent space” of local governments. The innovation path of social governance needs to emphasize the supervision and regulation in the implementation of the system, the optimization of the system and the setting of the system and the flexible setting of the local field.
