首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月09日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of surgical outcomes between integrated robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Chul Kyu Roh ; Seohee Choi ; Won Jun Seo
  • 期刊名称:Scientific Reports
  • 电子版ISSN:2045-2322
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-9
  • DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-57413-z
  • 出版社:Springer Nature
  • 摘要:Abstract This study was aimed to compare the surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (CLDG) and integrated robotic distal gastrectomy (IRDG) which used both Single-Site platform and fluorescence image-guided surgery technique simultaneously. Retrospective data of 56 patients who underwent IRDG and 152 patients who underwent CLDG were analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to control selection bias using age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and body mass index. Fifty-one patients were selected for each group. Surgical success was defined as the absence of open conversion, readmission, major complications, positive resection margin, and inadequate lymph node retrieval (<16). Patients characteristics and surgical outcomes of IRDG group were comparable to those of CLDG group, except longer operation time (159.5 vs. 131.7 min; P  < 0.001), less blood loss (30.7 vs. 73.3 mL; P  = 0.004), higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) (50.4 vs. 41.9 LNs; P  = 0.025), and lower readmission rate (2.0 vs. 15.7%; P  = 0.031). Surgical success rate was higher in IRDG group compared to CLDG group (98.0 vs. 82.4%; P  = 0.008). In conclusion, this study found that IRDG provides the benefits of higher number of retrieved LNs, less blood loss, and lower readmission rate compared with CLDG in patients with early gastric cancer.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有