摘要：Situs inversus of optic disc (SIOD) is thought to be a congenital optic disc abnormality that is caused by dysversion of optic nerve insertion. SIOD, however, has many additional features that cannot be explained by abnormal optic-nerve-insertion directionality. In this study, we measured the distance between the fovea and disc in 22 eyes of 15 SIOD patients. For comparison, two control eyes were matched with each SIOD eye by age and axial length. The vertical distance between the temporal vascular arcades also was measured. The foveo-disc distance was shorter in the SIOD eyes than in the control eyes, while the inter-arcade distance did not differ. Further, we measured the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, which showed nasal crowding of two humps in the SIOD eyes. This nasal crowding disappeared when we shifted the circle scan by the mean difference (465 μm) of the foveal-disc distance between the two groups. Our findings suggest that the optic disc was located closer to the fovea than it would have been normally. Thus, SIOD might reflect incomplete expansion of the posterior pole in the direction of the fovea-disc axis.
其他摘要：Abstract Situs inversus of optic disc (SIOD) is thought to be a congenital optic disc abnormality that is caused by dysversion of optic nerve insertion. SIOD, however, has many additional features that cannot be explained by abnormal optic-nerve-insertion directionality. In this study, we measured the distance between the fovea and disc in 22 eyes of 15 SIOD patients. For comparison, two control eyes were matched with each SIOD eye by age and axial length. The vertical distance between the temporal vascular arcades also was measured. The foveo-disc distance was shorter in the SIOD eyes than in the control eyes, while the inter-arcade distance did not differ. Further, we measured the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, which showed nasal crowding of two humps in the SIOD eyes. This nasal crowding disappeared when we shifted the circle scan by the mean difference (465 μm) of the foveal-disc distance between the two groups. Our findings suggest that the optic disc was located closer to the fovea than it would have been normally. Thus, SIOD might reflect incomplete expansion of the posterior pole in the direction of the fovea-disc axis.
