摘要：In this study we use undersampled MRI acquisition methods to obtain accelerated 3D mono and biexponential spin–lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρ) mapping of knee cartilage, reducing the usual long scan time. We compare the accelerated T1ρ maps obtained by deep learning-based variational network (VN) and compressed sensing (CS). Both methods were compared with spatial (S) and spatio-temporal (ST) filters. Complex-valued fitting was used for T1ρ parameters estimation. We tested with seven in vivo and six synthetic datasets, with acceleration factors (AF) from 2 to 10. Median normalized absolute deviation (MNAD), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for analysis. The methods CS-ST, VN-S, and VN-ST performed well for accelerating monoexponential T1ρ mapping, with MNAD around 5% for AF = 2, which increases almost linearly with the AF to an MNAD of 13% for AF = 8, with all methods. For biexponential mapping, the VN-ST was the best method starting with MNAD of 7.4% for AF = 2 and reaching MNAD of 13.1% for AF = 8. The VN was able to produce 3D-T1ρ mapping of knee cartilage with lower error than CS. The best results were obtained by VN-ST, improving CS-ST method by nearly 7.5%.
其他摘要：Abstract In this study we use undersampled MRI acquisition methods to obtain accelerated 3D mono and biexponential spin–lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T 1ρ ) mapping of knee cartilage, reducing the usual long scan time. We compare the accelerated T 1ρ maps obtained by deep learning-based variational network (VN) and compressed sensing (CS). Both methods were compared with spatial (S) and spatio-temporal (ST) filters. Complex-valued fitting was used for T 1ρ parameters estimation. We tested with seven in vivo and six synthetic datasets, with acceleration factors (AF) from 2 to 10. Median normalized absolute deviation (MNAD), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for analysis. The methods CS-ST, VN-S, and VN-ST performed well for accelerating monoexponential T 1ρ mapping, with MNAD around 5% for AF = 2, which increases almost linearly with the AF to an MNAD of 13% for AF = 8, with all methods. For biexponential mapping, the VN-ST was the best method starting with MNAD of 7.4% for AF = 2 and reaching MNAD of 13.1% for AF = 8. The VN was able to produce 3D-T 1ρ mapping of knee cartilage with lower error than CS. The best results were obtained by VN-ST, improving CS-ST method by nearly 7.5%.
