首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月05日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Association between 16S rRNA gene mutations and susceptibility to amikacin in Mycobacterium avium Complex and Mycobacterium abscessus clinical isolates
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Su-Young Kim ; Dae Hun Kim ; Seong Mi Moon
  • 期刊名称:Scientific Reports
  • 电子版ISSN:2045-2322
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:11
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:6108
  • DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-85721-5
  • 出版社:Springer Nature
  • 摘要:Abstract We evaluated the association between 16S rRNA gene ( rrs ) mutations and susceptibility in clinical isolates of amikacin-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in NTM-pulmonary disease (PD) patients. Susceptibility was retested for 134 amikacin-resistant isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥ 64 µg/ml) from 86 patients. Amikacin resistance was reconfirmed in 102 NTM isolates from 62 patients with either Mycobacterium avium complex-PD (MAC-PD) (n = 54) or M. abscessus -PD (n = 8). MICs and rrs mutations were evaluated for 318 single colonies from these isolates. For the 54 MAC-PD patients, rrs mutations were present in 34 isolates (63%), comprising all 31 isolates with amikacin MICs ≥ 128 µg/ml, but only three of 23 isolates with an MIC = 64 µg/ml. For the eight M. abscessus -PD patients, all amikacin-resistant (MIC ≥ 64 µg/ml) isolates had rrs mutations. In amikacin-resistant isolates, the A1408G mutation (n = 29) was most common. Two novel mutations, C1496T and T1498A, were also identified. The culture conversion rate did not differ by amikacin MIC. Overall, all high-level and 13% (3/23) of low-level amikacin-resistant MAC isolates had rrs mutations whereas mutations were present in all amikacin-resistant M. abscessus isolates. These findings are valuable for managing MAC- and M. abscessus -PD and suggest the importance of phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility testing.
  • 其他摘要:Abstract We evaluated the association between 16S rRNA gene ( rrs ) mutations and susceptibility in clinical isolates of amikacin-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in NTM-pulmonary disease (PD) patients. Susceptibility was retested for 134 amikacin-resistant isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥ 64 µg/ml) from 86 patients. Amikacin resistance was reconfirmed in 102 NTM isolates from 62 patients with either Mycobacterium avium complex-PD (MAC-PD) (n = 54) or M. abscessus -PD (n = 8). MICs and rrs mutations were evaluated for 318 single colonies from these isolates. For the 54 MAC-PD patients, rrs mutations were present in 34 isolates (63%), comprising all 31 isolates with amikacin MICs ≥ 128 µg/ml, but only three of 23 isolates with an MIC = 64 µg/ml. For the eight M. abscessus -PD patients, all amikacin-resistant (MIC ≥ 64 µg/ml) isolates had rrs mutations. In amikacin-resistant isolates, the A1408G mutation (n = 29) was most common. Two novel mutations, C1496T and T1498A, were also identified. The culture conversion rate did not differ by amikacin MIC. Overall, all high-level and 13% (3/23) of low-level amikacin-resistant MAC isolates had rrs mutations whereas mutations were present in all amikacin-resistant M. abscessus isolates. These findings are valuable for managing MAC- and M. abscessus -PD and suggest the importance of phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility testing.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有