首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月27日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Beach and indoor volleyball athletes present similar lower limb muscle activation during a countermovement jump
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Fabio Dal Bello ; Esteban Aedo-Muñoz ; Danilo Gomes Moreira
  • 期刊名称:Human Movement
  • 印刷版ISSN:1732-3991
  • 电子版ISSN:1899-1955
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:21
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:42-50
  • DOI:10.5114/hm.2020.89913
  • 出版社:Walter de Gruyter GmbH
  • 摘要:Purpose The study aimed to compare and correlate the power, height, eccentric and concentric force development rate of 3 sequential attempts of countermovement jump (CMJ) and the respective muscle response in beach and indoor volleyball athletes. Methods The sample involved high-level hard court indoor volleyball (HCIV, n = 7) and high-level sand court beach volleyball (SCBV, n = 6) athletes. They performed 3 CMJs (1st CMJ vs. 2nd CMJ vs. 3rd CMJ) to determine the height, eccentric force development rate (EFDR), concentric force development rate (CFDR), power, and lower limbs muscle electrical activity. Results Difference was demonstrated between HCIV vs. SCBV players in 3rd CMJ EFDR (–270.2 ± 31.6 N/s vs. –214.3 ± 38.7 N/s). In HCIV, 1st CMJ was different from 2nd CMJ and 3rd CMJ in EFDR (–239.0 ± 27.3 N/s vs. –285.6 ± 40.2 N/s and –270.2 ± 31.6 N/s), CFDR (87.8 ± 24.4 N/s vs. 89.6 ± 25.7 N/s and 75.0 ± 23.6 N/s), and power (2341.8 ± 342.3 W vs. 2433.9 ± 327.2 W and 2411.0 ± 358.5 W). In SCBV, 2nd CMJ was different from 3rd CMJ in EFDR (–267.1 ± 45.2 N/s vs. –214.3 ± 38.7 N/s). In 2nd CMJ, the left gluteus presented lower electrical activity than the left medial gastrocnemius, and HCIV revealed a difference between the response of the right and left gluteus in 3rd CMJ. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrated ca. 70% of good or excellent intra-class correlation between the beach and indoor groups.
  • 关键词:countermovement jump;volleyball biomechanics;EMG;muscle activity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有