出版社：Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Comercial (Senac)
摘要：The holistic paradigm has been pointed out for many years as an approach to be considered in the development of Knowledge Management (KM) frameworks. The Moscoso-Zea, Lujan-Mora, Caceres and Schweimanns model is a recently developed KM framework, which cited studies that preach Holistic Knowledge Management (HKM). The purpose of this research is to analyze the adherence of the framework to the HKM in order to discern if the management proposed by this framework has been considered following the holistic paradigm. The analysis is developed employing mixed methodological procedures, which makes use of qualitative content analysis and the quantitative approach. The results show that the analyzed framework only partially adheres to HKM, revealing the need to develop new frameworks that consider all dimensions together, such as are presented here. This research contributes by weaving a view that adjusts KM to the holistic paradigm and by proposing a method to enable the analysis of KM frameworks using a holistic approach. The analysis of other frameworks, considering the procedures adopted in this study, is a suggestion for future research. Thus, other studies may consider the findings of this research for the development of structures that encompass KM in its entirety within the organizational scope.
