首页    期刊浏览 2024年07月08日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Xian Hou ; Shengkai Pan ; Zhenzhen Lin
  • 期刊名称:Avian Research
  • 印刷版ISSN:2053-7166
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-8
  • DOI:10.1186/s40657-021-00254-9
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:As an important player during food digestion, gut microbiota has attracted much attention in diet adaptation studies in birds. Microbiota extracted from feces has been widely used as a proxy for gut microbiota. Although several methods have been developed for microbial DNA extraction, their performances in the bird feces have not been systematacially evaluated yet. In this study, we applied three DNA extraction methods (Qiagen, MoBio and Bead) to extract DNA from feces of three avian dietary guilds (granivore, omnivore and carnivore), sequenced V4 region of 16S rRNA gene for each extract and evaluated the performances of DNA yield, DNA integrity, microbial composition, cell lysis capacity and alpha diversity for the three methods on each dietary guild. Bead method was the best on the performance of both DNA yield and DNA integrity regardless of dietary guild. In granivore, microbial relative abundance at both species and phylum levels, alpha diversity and cell lysis capacity were comparable among all methods. In omnivore, Qiagen had the best performance on alpha diversity, followed by Bead and MoBio. There were small variations on microbial relative abundance at both species and phylum levels among different extraction methods. MoBio exhibited the best performance on cell lysis capacity. In carnivore, considerable variations were found on microbial relative abundance at both species and phylum levels. Qiagen had the best performance on alpha diversity, followed by MoBio and Bead. MoBio had the highest cell lysis capacity. DNA yield and integrity have no obvious impact on microbial composition, alpha diversity or cell lysis capacity. The microbiota results (e.g., microbial composition, cell lysis capacity, alpha diversity) obtained from different methods are comparable in granivorous avian species but not in omnivorous or carnivorous birds. Either method could be used in granivore microbiota studies. For omnivores and carnivores, we recommend Qiagen method when the research purpose is microbial diversity and MoBio when gram-positive bacteria is the research target.
  • 关键词:16S rRNA ; Alpha diversity ; Avian ; Dietary guild ; Feces ; DNA extraction method ; Microbial relative abundance
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有