摘要：Theorically, this research aims to study: 1. Abuhamed Ghazali’s ideas about moral education analitically; 2. Albert Bandura’s ideas on moral education; 3. the extent to which their ideas might correspond and practically, to compare Albert Bandura’s experimental findings with ghazali’s religious viewpoint. The main question is: what are Albert Bandura and ghazali’s views on moral education and include on which elemans? This researche, has applied library method and content analysis of scientific and religious texts in a rational way to understand and infer above mentioned Scholars ideas coherently in humanistic foundeations,aims, principls, methods and agents of moral education. som of findings of the research shown that their ideas are in harmony in certain “the humanistic fundamentals of moral education”, although, over some others, there are some clear and definite disagreements between them.Regarding “aims of moral education”, ghazali’s consider moral education and faith-based education along the same lines, but Bandura propose nothing for discussion about the latter at all. Therefore, there are some disagreements between them about deciding on educational aims. With respect to the principles of education, although they have some different views about, for example, interpreting of an educational principle, it is possible to find many similarities in their viewpoints.
