摘要：The aim of this research is to compare 2005 Science and Technology curriculum, 2013 and 2018 Science curriculums. For this purpose, the curriculum obtained from the site of the Board of Education were examined using qualitative research methods which document analysis in details. Curriculums were compared by taking into account the objectives, gains, content, teaching-learning and measurement-evaluation process. The data were analyzed using the content analysis method. At the end of the research, it was determined that students should be educated as science literate individuals in all curriculums. On the axis of this aim, it was observed that the general objectives for the training of individuals who can use the scientific method, who can look at the world from a scientist's point of view and who can use the scientific process skills effectively. In addition, it was determined that gains was created on the axis of these purposes a spiral program design concept, that there is a continuous decrease in the number of gains and that there is not much change in the content, teaching-learning process and measurement-evaluation dimensions of the curriculums. The following suggestions was made for the experts of curriculum developments and researchers in the light of these results: It seems important that evaluation of the curriculums by conducting quantitative research in accordance with the opinions of the stakeholders, rewrite of the gains in the curricula in details, renewal of the content on the axis of current scientific data, the curriculums include sample activities and measurement-evaluation applications and to renew the curriculum in line with the suggestions from the curriculum development specialists, teachers and other stakeholders.
