首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Is research working for you? validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Anita Kothari ; Nancy Edwards ; Nadia Hamel
  • 期刊名称:Implementation Science
  • 印刷版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 电子版ISSN:1748-5908
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:46
  • DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-4-46
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:'Is research working for you? A self-assessment tool and discussion guide for health services management and policy organizations', developed by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, is a tool that can help organizations understand their capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research. Objectives were to: determine whether the tool demonstrated response variability; describe how the tool differentiated between organizations that were known to be lower-end or higher-end research users; and describe the potential usability of the tool. Thirty-two focus groups were conducted among four sectors of Canadian health organizations. In the first hour of the focus group, participants individually completed the tool and then derived a group consensus ranking on items. In the second hour, the facilitator asked about overall impressions of the tool, to identify insights that emerged during the review of items on the tool and to elicit comments on research utilization. Discussion data were analyzed qualitatively, and individual and consensus item scores were analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics. The tool demonstrated good usability and strong response variability. Differences between higher-end and lower-end research use organizations on scores suggested that this tool has adequate discriminant validity. The group discussion based on the tool was the more useful aspect of the exercise, rather than the actual score assigned. The tool can serve as a catalyst for an important discussion about research use at the organizational level; such a discussion, in and of itself, demonstrates potential as an intervention to encourage processes and supports for research translation.
  • 关键词:Focus Group ; Research Capacity ; Government Sector ; Consensus Score ; Health Service Management
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有