Identity bank: research institute launched by College Fund/UNCF has a big job ahead of it - United Negro College Fund
James Michael BrodieFormer Congressman William H. Gray III has to look no further
than his battles on the floor of the U.S., House of Representatives
over race-specific scholarships in justifying how key the College Fund/United
Negro College Fund's newly created Frederick D. Patterson
Research Institute can
be to Black America.
In 1990, when then
Assistant Education Secretary
Michael Williams
created a stir by trying
to eliminate the scholarships,
Gray and other
Black legislators convinced
the George Bush
administration that the
furor Williams created
was groundless by
showing, statistically,
how few race-based
scholarships existed
compared to those
given based on sex, religion,
geography and other factors.
"Here I was as majority whip, with the White House and Justice
Department making major policy -- and we didn't have the facts. it
became clear to me that there was no place in the United States where
you could pick up a phone and quickly get data," explains the UNCF
president and CEO, who touts his brainchild as "the first research
institute of its kind" controlled by the Black community.
"The real point here is that people were making policy
based on perception, not reality," says Gray,
who recently unveiled the new institute,
which will focus research exclusively on the
status of Black students, preschool to
postgraduate.
"We are real excited about this," he says.
"You know, we spend billions of dollars on
education in this country, billions trying to deal
with the problems of minorities -- particularly
African Americans. But what do we base that
expenditure on? Often it's a partial study, an
isolated study. It is not based on fact."
Gray says he expects his data to be "very
much up to date, within a year to two years."
He adds, "There will be a broad range of
original research going on, as well as data
collection. We will use the best scientific
methodologies."
Though he is
vague as to exactly
how the data will
be gathered, Gray
related that in the
course of conducting
original research,
the institute might first
focus on standardized
testing, and
the enrollment
and employment
of African Americans
regionally
and nationally. He
said that the institute
might undertake to gather information
directly from individual schools.
Observers Hopeful
Around the country, observers are hopeful
that the institute can fulfill Gray's vision,
though they are cautious when discussing how
successful the institute, named for UNCF
founder Frederick D. Patterson, can be.
"You want to keep in the front of
America's consciousness how much Blacks
need to achieve education-wise," says Dr.
Kenneth S. Tollett Sr., professor of higher
education policy at Howard University and an
advisor to the American Association of
University Professor's committee on
historically Black institutions and the status of
minorities in the profession. "What is
happening in the country now is that people
are just washing their hands of the problems"
in the Black community, particularly in light
of the Los Angeles riots of a few years ago and
growing racial divisions on several issues.
"The hope is that there is a reservoir of
decency in both Blacks and whites that will
cause them to want to direct these deficits," he
says. "The research also would
indicate that there still is a
need for Head Start,
affirmative action and special
consideration."
Dr. Reginald Wilson, senior
scholar at the American
Council on Education, has
spoken with Gray about his
plans for the institute and
sees a potential benefit. "It
depends on what it's going to
do." says Wilson. "The
institute potentially could do
a good job."
"For example, Blacks have
lower SAT scores than any
other group, and Blacks have
been here longer than any
other group. There are not the
language barriers
that Hispanics and Asians
we have not been isolated
like Native Americans
have been, so why are the
scores lower?" Wilson
muses. "Nobody has looked
those scores to determine
exactly what has happened.
Right now all we can do is
speculate because we don't
have the time or the resources
to come up with the answers."
"In any research project, the most crucial
item is what you are assuming when you put the
project together. The questions you ask are
directly related to the kinds of answers you
generate," says Dr. William King, professor of
Afro-American studies at the University of
Colorado's Department of Ethnic
Studies -- formerly the Center
for Studies of Ethnicity and
Race in America.
"If what they have is a
response to funding cutbacks
that's one thing. But if what
they have is their version of
what has been done before,
then it may or may not be
something new."
`No One to Call'
The UNCF/College Fund
raised $5 million in
endowments over the past four
years to launch the institute.
Gray tapped University of
Michigan's Dr. Michael T.
Nettles in December to head
the institute on a part-time
basis. Nettles will hire staff, set
priorities and coordinate data.
Both men project that their
first report will come out by
the end of the year. Gray
expects the data will be
current, perhaps no older than
a year or two.
"The institute has to have some level of
autonomy to be able to report the facts, so that
people can review them as things to work on.
We will be trying to tell the balanced story,"
says Nettles, whose career in education research
in Tennessee, Iowa and Michigan dates to the
1970s.
"We are trying to persuade some people
about priorities," he says. "We won't try to
address every single education issue immediately.
That's not to say that at some point in our
history that we would not have touched on most
of the vital issues of the time."
While there are several organizations
looking at different aspects of Black educational
life -- such as NAFEO, the joint Center for
Political Research, the Children's Defense Fund,
the American Council on Education, the
American Association of University Professors,
even the Census Bureau and the Department of
Education -- none covers the full scope, argues
Gray.
"If you, wanted to know how many Black
males there are in American colleges, who are
you going to call?" Gray asks. "There is no one
to call. There is no one."
Resources Drying Up
In recent years, such organizations as the
Institute for the Study of Education Policy at
Howard University closed its doors, and the
Education Department's Office of Educational
Research and Improvement has been cut back,
leading many to fear that what little data there
was on Black education is in danger of drying up.
"There really aren't many people doing
that" says Tollett. "There was no think tank
that was dealing with issues affecting Blacks
from a Black perspective. You have a lot of
research going on regarding the condition of
Blacks but little of it is controlled by Blacks."
Adds Wilson, "We at ACE have had
increasing difficulty in getting statistics on the
progress of minorities in higher education, and I
would assume that those institutions that are
devoted to K-12 education are having similar
difficulties. We depend on the federal
government for these national statistics on
minority progress, and if we are having this
much difficulty, I would imagine that no matter
how well-endowed the Patterson Institute is, it
will also have some difficulty getting them."
Wake-up Call
Some are skeptical as to whether Gray and
Nettles are biting off more than they can chew.
One director of a Black education association
wondered aloud how much the institute would
really add, or whether it would merely duplicate
the work of others.
"There are some tensions out there," says
N. Joyce Payne, director of the Office for the
Advancement of Public Black Colleges. "Some
people are raising questions about usurping
authority, but hopefully there will be an
opportunity to engage the larger community in
this. There's some structural and relationship
issues that need to be talked about as they build
that enterprise."
Gray is careful not to use the word "control"
as he stresses the need for Black research based
in the Black community. But he and others
point to the barrage of controversial research of
Black life that has become part of the American
mainstream as a wake-up call for Black
researchers.
"There have been a lot of people studying
us, and talking about us, but it is important that
African-American people look at themselves,
have available the data and information, and be
involved in the interpretation of that data and
information," says Gray. "Otherwise, it will
always be somebody studying the community
and bringing their biases to that study."
By taking charge of their own research,
which African-American scholars have done
more ferociously over the past three decades,
they are laying waste to long-held notions from
those outside the community that Blacks are
too close to their subject -- their own
community -- to provide adequate or unbiased
data.
"I see people saying that Black folk
shouldn't be doing that, but every other group
does it," argues Gray.
"UNCF can concentrate on Black
experiences in education. They don't have to
apologize for that. it's their business," Wilson
agrees. "As a consequence, they can say Blacks
are progressing because of this and they are
being held back because of this -- and they are
not being held back in the same way that
Hispanics are being held back because this and
this and this happened historically."
`About Identity'
For some, the idea of an identifiable Black
research clearinghouse carries a more spiritual
importance -- Black people defining Black
people.
"If you count the emphasis that we have
placed on action and intervention and compare
that to the emphasis we have placed on research
you will find that the scales tilt in favor of
action," Nettles argues.
"It's about identity. That's all it has ever
been. If you go back and look at the slave
petitions to colonial legislatures, you will see
the same questions -- questions about identity,
and action components," the University of
Colorado's King offers. "in other words, how
do I act? We allowed ourselves to
be reinvented in someone else's
image of us. We didn't spend a lot
time addressing questions of
identity, self-knowledge,
self-consciousness, self-awareness."
Payne views the institute as
symbolic not only of a logical
progression in Black research, but
as long overdue.
"We have enough Michael Nettleses out
there to make a difference," she says. "It's
obviously more important that you have people
who are fair, who believe in truth and justice and
all of that -- and in an ideal world, we would
have those people carry out the research agenda.
But that has not been the case, so it is important
that African Americans play a major role in
determining what the priorities are,"
Payne adds, "I thought we had already
defined who we are as a people. If you look at
the radical change in the amount of research
documents and literature Black scholars and
writers have produced, we have been pretty
prolific. We have been much more assertive
about defining who
we are as a community.
"I don't think that in 1996 it would be
politically imaginable to accept the notion that
we have not defined who we are -- especially in
the academy. I'm not sure if we have used that
information as strategically as we need to in
order to fight back against the powerful forces
of conservatism. We need to get on a collision
course with some of that and take on the Newt
Gingriches of the world."
"There is always the problem of
transcending our submergence in a white world,"
says Tollett. "We all have to overcome the
effect of being educated in a white society, at a
predominately white college -- lest we see things
essentially the same way white people see
things."
Says Wilson, "They may not come up with
anything new, but they can come up with a
broad speculation about Blacks in education that
others are not getting at this time."
COPYRIGHT 1996 Cox, Matthews & Associates
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group