电话：010-85195300
E-mail：cassoa@cass.org.cn
地址：中国北京建国门内大街5号中国社会科学院1#楼
扫一扫关注微信
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有
Chlorophyll Derived from Chlorella Inhibits Dioxin Absorption from the Gastrointestinal Tract and Accelerates Dioxin Excretion in Rats
Kunimasa MoritaWe investigated the effects of chlorophyll derived from Chlorella on gastrointestinal absorption of seven types of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD) and 10 types of polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) in Wistar rats. Twenty-eight rats were randomly distributed into seven groups (n = 4). After overnight food deprivation, rats were given 4 g of the basal diet or 4 g of the chlorophyll diet containing 0.01-0.5% chlorophyll one time on day 1; each diet also contained 0.2 mL PCDD and PCDF standard solutions. The amounts of fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners from days 1 to 5 in the group fed 0.01% chlorophyll were 64.8% for 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, 78.6% for 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexaCDD, 73.5% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDD, 58.5% for 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexaCDD, 33.3% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDD, 85.7% for 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDF, 77.3% for 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF, 88.6% for 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexaCDF, 78.0% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDF, 62.5% for 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexaCDF, 84.1% for 2,3,4,6,7,8-hexaCDF, 41.7% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDF, and 40.0% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDF greater (p [is less than] 0.01) than those of the control group, respectively. The fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners was remarkably increased along with the increasing dietary chlorophyll. The amounts of PCDD and PCDF congeners in rats on day 5 administered dioxin mixtures were lower in the 0.01% chlorophyll group than in the control group, ranging from 3.5 to 50.0% for PCDD congeners and from 3.7 to 41.7% lower for PCDF congeners, except for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran. The amount of PCDD and PCDF congeners in rats was remarkably decreased along with the increasing dietary chlorophyll. These findings suggest that chlorophyll is effective for preventing dioxin absorption via foods. Key words: Chlorella, chlorophyll, dioxin, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins rats. Environ Health Perspect 109:289-294 (2001). [Online 2 March 2001]
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2001/109p289-294morita/abstract.html
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) congeners are among most toxic synthetic chemicals known. They cause cancer promotion, immunosuppression, hyperkeratosis, hepatotoxicity, and tetratogenicity in experimental animals (1).
The main route of human contamination by dioxins seems to be through foods (2,3). Because of the lipophilic nature of dioxin, it tends to be stored in fat and thus to be present at relatively high concentrations in the fat of animal and fish products. Japanese diets generally include large amounts of seafood, and the percentage of intake of PCDD, PCDF, and coplanar PCB congeners via seafoods is accordingly high--62.4% of the total daily intake [1.4-3.2 pg toxic equivalents (TEQ)/kg body weight per day in Japan] (4). Fatty seafoods obtained from along the coast of Japan are highly contaminated with dioxin, whereas seafoods obtained far from the coast of Japan are less contaminated with dioxin (5). In contrast, European and American diets generally include the consumption of large quantities of meat, eggs, and dairy products, which are highly contaminated with PCDD, PCDF, and coplanar PCB congeners; the intake of these congeners from all food sources is approximately 0.3-3.0 pg TEQ/kg body weight per day in adult Americans (2).
Breast milk is also a source of dioxin exposure in infants. For most of the dioxin congeners, the absorption of 2,3,7,8-tetra-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) dissolved in corn oil is [is greater than] 87% after an overnight fast in human adults (6). In rats, the half-life of TCDD in the body is 31 days, and the half-life of 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (pentaCDF) is 64 days (7,8), but in humans, the reported biological half-life of TCDD in the body is 5.8 years in adults (6) or 11.3 years in soldiers who were veterans of the Vietnam war (9); moreover, the half-lives of 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF and 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachlorodibenzofuran (hexaCDF) are 13.4 years and 12.0 years, respectively, in patients with Yusho disease who consumed rice oil contaminated with PCDF and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (10). Symptoms of Yusho disease include limb numbness, coughing, expectoration, fever, headache, dizziness, abdominal pain, and swelling in the joints (11).
The excretion rate of dioxin stored in the human body is much slower than that of other mammals. The TCDD absorbed in the body of guinea pigs was not detected in either urine or bile, and was eliminated directly to the digestive tract and excreted into the feces (12). To prevent health problems caused by dioxin exposure in humans, it is important to capture the dioxin in the digestive tract and prevent its absorption. In the case of humans who have already been exposed to dioxin and accumulated it in their bodies, the goal is to inhibit dioxin reabsorption from the digestive tract, resulting in a decrease of its accumulation in the body. We have reported the effect of dietary fiber on absorption of PCDD and PCDF congeners. In addition, we reported the stimulating effect of dietary fiber on fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners stored in the body of rats orally administered the rice oil that caused Yusho disease (13-15).
All plants possess chlorophyll for the purpose of photosynthesis. There is no clear evidence of the metabolism or toxicity of dietary chlorophyll. Baxter (16) reported that dietary chlorophyll was not absorbed in the body and that instead it was metabolized and excreted in feces as pheophytin in humans and rats. It was reported that chlorophyllin, a chlorophyll derivative, formed a complex with heterocyclic amines such as 2-amino-3-methylimidazo [4,5-f]-quinoline and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine (17,18). The amount of unmetabolized heterocyclic amine excreted in feces was increased by oral administration of chlorophyllin. We have recently reported that Chlorella accelerates dioxin excretion in rats (19). In this study, to elucidate the effect of chlorophyll derived from Chlorella, we examined the fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners in rats administered a mixture with dioxin.
Materials and Methods
Animals. Male Wistar rats (average 138 g) were purchased from Seac Yoshitomi Co., Ltd. (Fukuoka, Japan) and kept in the animal facility of the Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences. Rats were raised in metabolic cages with constant humidity and exposed to a 12:12 hr light-dark cycle. Water and feed were consumed ad libitum. Animals received the experimental diets shown in Table 1. The mineral and vitamin mixtures were purchased from Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Animal care and use conformed to published guidelines (20).
Table 1. Composition of the experimental diets.
Chlorophyll diet (g/100 g)
Basal
Component diet 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5
Sucrose 65 64.99 64.98 64.95 94.9 64.8 64.5
Cellulose 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Casein 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Corn oil 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mineral mixture(a) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Vitamin mixture(a) 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Choline chloride 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Chlorophyll 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5
The basal diet was fed during acclimation, and the basal or
chlorophyll diet was fed during study periods; 0.2 mL corn oil
containing 7 types of PCDD and 10 types of PCDF congeners were
mixed with 4 g of the basal diet or 4 g of the chlorophyll diet
and administered to rats once during the experimental period on
day 1.
(a) Composition of mineral mixture (g/100 g): CaH[PO.sub.4]
[multiplied by] 2[H.sub.2]O, 0.43; [KH.sub.2][PO.sub.4], 34.31;
NaCl, 25.06; Fe-citrate, 0.623; Mg[SO.sub.4] [multiplied by]
7[H.sub.2]O, 9.98; Zn[Cl.sub.2], 0.02; Mn[SO.sub.4] [multiplied by]
4- 6 [H.sub.2]O, 0.121; Cu[SO.sub.4] [multiplied by] 5[H.sub.2]O,
0.156; KI, 0.0005; Ca[CO.sub.3], 29.29; ([NH.sub.4])6[Mo.sub.7]
[O.sub.24]4[H.sub.2]O, 0.0025. Composition of vitamin mixture
(mg/100 g): retinyl acetate, 16; cholecalciferol, 0.6;
all-rac-[Alpha]-tocopheryl acetate, 1,200; menadione, 6; thiamine
[multiplied by] HCI, 59; riboflavin, 59; pyridoxine-HCl, 29;
cyanocobalamine, 0.2; ascorbic acid, 588; biotin, 1; folic acid, 2;
calcium-pantothenate, 235; nicotinic acid, 294; inositol, 1,176.
Samples and chemicals. Chlorophyll was prepared from Chlorella dry powder manufactured by Chlorella Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). The method of chlorophyll preparation was based on the acetone-dioxane extraction method (21). The purity of the chlorophyll was about 86% (chlorophyll a, 73%; chlorophyll b, 13%). Chlorophyll preparations were stored at -20 [degrees] C until used for experiments. Native PCDD and PCDF standard solution (7 PCDD and 10 PCDF; Wellington Laboratories, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) was given to rats (average 155 g) by feeding them the experimental diet containing 0.2 mL native PCDD and PCDF standard solutions (1.29 mL/kg body weight, 218 ng TEQ/kg body weight) per 4 g of the diet. We used this formulation to prevent diarrhea. [sup.13]C-labeled PCDD and PCDF standard solution dissolved in n-nonane was used as an internal standard. The concentrations of PCDD and PCDF in the standard solution used in these experiments are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Concentrations of PCDD and PCDF congeners
in dioxin mixture dissolved in corn oil.
Concentration
Dioxin ([micro]g/L)
TCDD 50
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 100
2,3,7,8-TCDF 50
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 50
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 50
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 50
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 100
Hexane, acetone, chloroform, methanol, dichloromethane, and Florisil were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). These reagents were of the grade required for residual agricultural drug measurements. All other reagents were special grade or better. Silica gel of silver nitrate was prepared as follows. We dissolved 10 g silver nitrate in 5 mL [H.sub.2]O by heating. We added 8.5 g of Kieselgel 60 (70-230 mesh; Merck & Co., Inc., Darmstadt, Germany) to the silver nitrate solution, mixed it, and left it overnight.
Test for effects of chlorophyll administration on dioxin absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. After a 5-day acclimation period, 28 rats were randomly distributed into 7 groups (n = 4). After overnight food deprivation, rats (mean body weight 155 g) were given 4 g of the basal diet or 4 g of the chlorophyll diet containing 0.01-0.5% chlorophyll one time on day 1, with each serving containing 0.2 mL dioxin mixture (Tables 1 and 2).
The average of total dioxin intake from foodstuffs is 2.4 pg TEQ/kg/day in Japan (4). The dose of dioxin mixture in this experiment was 218 ng TEQ/kg/day, which is 90,800-fold higher than the average total dioxin intake by humans in Japan.
We reported previously (19) that the 10% Chlorella diet inhibited the absorption and accelerated the excretion of dioxins, which suggests that the main effective component was chlorophyll. In this experiment, we studied the effect of chlorophyll on dioxin absorption. In our previous study (19) we determined that a 10% Chlorella diet contained 0.2% chlorophyll; therefore, the dose we tested in the present study was between 0.01 and 0.5%. A 0.01% chlorophyll diet corresponds to a diet of approximately 10% spinach or 20% seaweed. We chose to add the dioxin mixture to a regular diet rather than dissolving it in corn oil because corn oil tends to cause diarrhea. Rats of the seven groups were each fed the diet containing the dioxin mixture on day 1, and then fed the dioxin-free basal diet or the dioxin-free chlorophyll diet on days 1-5.
Rats were housed individually in metabolic cages designed for the separate collection of feces and urine. Body weight, food intake, and fecal weight (from days 1 to 5) were measured. Feces were dried overnight at 70 [degrees] C, and the weight of feces was measured. After being fed the respective experimental diets for 5 days, rats were anesthetized with ether and the whole bodies of the rats were homogenized with a vertical cutter mixer (R-3 plus; FMI Co., Osaka, Japan). The fresh homogenates were stored at -20 [degrees] C until use for dioxin determination.
Analysis of dioxin. Fecal samples from each rat were homogenized and quantitatively extracted with 150 mL chloroform:methanol (2:1, v/v) in a cylindrical glass-fiber filter in a Soxhlet extractor. The individual extract of each sample was concentrated to approximately 5 mL by evaporation and then diluted with chloroform to a final volume of 50 mL. To analyze the dioxin level in each fecal sample, we put 2-10 mL extract into a test tube (10 mL); the sample was then centrifuged, concentrated, and dried. After adding 200 pg stable isotope tracer, [sup.13]C-labeled internal standard of tetra-hepta CDDs and tetra-hepta CDFs (Wellington Laboratories), and/or 1,000 pg [sup.13]C-labeled internal standard of octaCDDs and octaCDFs (Wellington Laboratories), we added 1 mL 1 M KOH in ethanol to each sample; the sample was then hydrolyzed overnight at room temperature.
The alkali hydrolysates of each sample were shaken with 2 mL hexane plus 0.5 mL [H.sub.2]O and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10 min. The hexane layer was then collected.
The aqueous layer was extracted 2 times with 2 mL hexane. The collected hexane layer was washed with 2 mL [H.sub.2]O and concentrated to 2 mL, and the hexane extract was washed 4 times with 2 mL concentrated [H.sub.2][SO.sub.4].
The hexane extract was applied to a 0.8-g silver nitrate column (7 mm diameter) and eluted from the column with 8 mL hexane, and then the eluate was concentrated to 1 mL. Next, the hexane extract was applied to a 0.6-g Florisil (U.S. Silica Company, New York, NY, USA) column (7 mm diameter) and dioxin was eluted with 4 mL hexane, followed by 8 mL dichloromethane. The eluates from the column were dried and dissolved in 50 [micro]L n-nonane. We measured the levels of PCDD and PCDF congeners in these samples.
Approximately 10 g homogenate from the whole body of each rat was put into a test tube (50 mL) for centrifugation; we then added 200 pg stable isotope tracer, [sup.13]C-labeled internal standard of tetra-hepta CDDs and tetra-hepta CDFs, and/or 1,000 pg [sup.13]C-labeled internal standard of octaCDDs and octaCDFs to the homogenate. We added 10 mL 1.5 M KOH in ethanol to each sample, and the sample was then hydrolyzed overnight at room temperature. The alkali hydrolysates of each sample were shaken with 10 mL hexane plus 5 mL [H.sub.2]O and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10 min and hexane layers were collected. The aqueous layer was extracted 2 times with 10 mL hexane. The collected hexane was washed with 5 mL [H.sub.2]O and concentrated to 20 mL. The subsequent procedures were the same as for the dioxin analysis of fecal samples.
Dioxin analysis was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (AutoSpec-Ultima; Micromass Ltd., Manchester, England) with a capillary column (0.25 mm x 60 m, BPX5; SGE Co., Yokohama, Japan) and setting the resolution mode at 10,000; quantification was performed in the selected ion monitoring acquisition mode.
We calculated the inhibition of gastrointestinal absorption in the chlorophyll group compared with the control group using the following equation: inhibition of gastrointestinal absorption due to the chlorophyll diet (%) = {[gastrointestinal absorption in the control group (%)] - [gastrointestinal absorption in the chlorophyll group (%)]}/{[gastrointestinal absorption in the control group (%)] x 100}.
Statistics
We tested differences between the control group and the chlorophyll groups by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using StatView for the Macintosh (Brain Power, Calabasas, CA, USA). A p-value of [is less than] 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effects of chlorophyll on body weight, food intake, and fecal weight. There was no significant difference in body weight gain or food intake between the control group and all of the six chlorophyll groups (Table 3). Total fecal weight during days 1-5 was significantly lower (p [is less than] 0.01) in the rats fed the 0.1% chlorophyll diet compared with those fed the basal diet and unchanged in the other chlorophyll groups.
Table 3. Effect of the chlorophyll diet on food intake,
body weight gain, and feces weight in rats administered
the dioxin mixtures.
Food intake Body weight gain
Group (g/5 days) (g/5 days)
Basal diet 105.4 [+ or -] 1.0 52.8 [+ or -] 2.8
0.01% chlorophyll 103.6 [+ or -] 2.0 53.0 [+ or -] 0.9
0.02% chlorophyll 104.3 [+ or -] 1.3 53.3 [+ or -] 2.8
0.05% chlorophyll 102.9 [+ or -] 3.2 52.8 [+ or -] 3.5
0.1% chlorophyll 101.5 [+ or -] 8.2 57.6 [+ or -] 4.9
0.2% chlorophyll 102.8 [+ or -] 4.0 56.2 [+ or -] 3.5
0.5% chlorophyll 103.7 [+ or -] 4.6 53.0 [+ or -] 3.4
Feces weight
Group (g/5 days)
Basal diet 5.4 [+ or -] 0.2
0.01% chlorophyll 5.4 [+ or -] 0.5
0.02% chlorophyll 5.3 [+ or -] 0.2
0.05% chlorophyll 5.0 [+ or -] 0.3
0.1% chlorophyll 4.5 [+ or -] 0.2(*)
0.2% chlorophyll 5.3 [+ or -] 0.8
0.5% chlorophyll 5.8 [+ or -] 0.3
Values represent the mean [+ or -] SD (n = 4). Rats consumed
0.2 mL corn oil containing 7 types of PCDD and 10 types of
PCDF congeners.
(*) Significantly different from basal group (p < 0.01).
Effect of chlorophyll on fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners. In the control group, the percentage of fecal excretion of PCDD congeners from days 1 to 5 in rats administered the dioxin mixture was 1.4% for TCDD, 3.6% for 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, 9.5% for 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexaCDD, 11.4% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDD, 21.7% for 1,2,3,7,8, 9-hexaCDD, 41.1% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDD, and 72.9% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDD; that of PCDF congeners was 1.1% for 2,3,7,8-TCDF, 4.7% for 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDF, 3.0% for 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF, 14.9% for 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexaCDF, 14.0% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDF, 13.5% for 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexaCDF, 14.9% for 2,3,4,6,7,8-hexaCDF, 41.5% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDF, 33.1% for 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-heptaCDF, and 65.0% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDF (Figure 1). The percentage of fecal excretion of TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF, which are resistant to metabolic degradation and show a tendency to be stored in the body, was lower than that of penta-octa CDD and CDF congeners. In fact, the percentage of fecal excretion of penta-octa CDD and CDF congeners was increased compared to the TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF congeners in the control group. On the other hand, in the 0.01% chlorophyll group, the percentage of fecal excretion of PCDD congeners was 2.3-76.4% and that of PCDF congeners was 1.7-76.7%. The 0.01% chlorophyll diet significantly accelerated the fecal excretion of five types of PCDD and eight types .of PCDF congeners, except TCDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDD, 2,3,7,8-TCDF, and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDF.
[GRAPH OMITTED]
The fecal excretion of TCDD was significantly increased in the 0.02-0.5% chlorophyll group, and the fecal excretion of 2,3,7,8-TCDF was significantly increased in the 0.05-0.5% chlorophyll group compared to the control group. The fecal excretion of penta-octa CDD and CDF congeners, which show a tendency to be excreted from the body, were significantly increased in the 0.01-0.5% chlorophyll group compared to the control group. In rats fed the 0.02-0.5% chlorophyll diets, the fecal excretions of TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF, which are highly toxic (33), were 72.1-1265.1%, 107.6-1148.6%, and 127.3-1470.5% greater, respectively (p [is less than] 0.05 or p [is less than] 0.01), than those of the control group. In rats fed 0.02-0.5% chlorophyll diets, the amounts of fecal excretion of 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDD and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDF, which are less toxic, were 14.0-32.6% and 25.6-41.0% greater, respectively (p [is less than] 0.01), than those of the control group. The percent inhibition of absorption in rats fed the 0.01-0.5% chlorophyll diets was 0.9-18.7%, 2.4-42.2%, and 2.4-45.1% for the highly toxic TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF congeners, respectively. On the other hand, the percent inhibition of absorption in rats fed the 0.01-0.5% chlorophyll diets was 12.9-95.6% and 33.4-82.1% for the less toxic 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDD and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDF, respectively. Overall, the gastrointestinal absorption of these compounds was strikingly inhibited in rats fed the chlorophyll diet. The fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners was increased in proportion to the chlorophyll content of the diet from 0.01% to 0.5% chlorophyll. These results imply that all of the compounds are resistant to metabolism, and the results for the fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners show that the percentage found in the feces clearly increased with chlorophyll and log P/lipophilicity of the specific congeners.
Effect of chlorophyll on the level of dioxin stored in rats' bodies. The amounts of PCDD and PCDF congeners stored in the bodies of rats administered the dioxin mixture on day 5 are shown in Figure 2. In the control group, the amounts of PCDD congeners stored in the bodies of rats administered the dioxin mixture were 22.7-94.2%, and those of PCDF congeners were 20.4-95.6%. The amounts of hepta--octa CDD and CDF congeners stored in the body were lower than the amounts of tetra--hexa CDD and CDF congeners, except 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDF, in the control group. The amounts of 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDF stored in the body were lowered, although the fecal excretion of these PCDF congeners was lower. These inconsistent results imply that 2,3,7,8-TCDF and 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDF absorbed in the body were catabolized and metabolized to other metabolites. These data are consistent with those of Brewster and Birnbaum (22,23). On the other hand, in the 0.01% chlorophyll group, the amounts of PCDD congeners stored in the body were 12.3-89.8%, and the amounts of PCDF congeners were 11.3-92.1%. The 0.01% chlorophyll diet significantly lowered the amounts of three types of PCDD congeners compared to the control group (72.8% vs. 84.5% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDD, 60.6% vs. 75.6% for 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexaCDD, and 36.3% vs. 57.4% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDD) and four types of PCDF congeners (68.9% vs. 86.2% for 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexaCDF, 70.6% vs. 83.5% for 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexaCDF, 27.9% vs. 43.6% for 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptaCDF, and 44.8% vs. 62.7% for 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-heptaCDF) stored in the body. The amounts of TCDD stored in the body were lowered significantly in the O. 1-0.5% chlorophyll group compared to levels in the control group, whereas the amounts of 2,3,7,8-TCDF stored in the body were unchanged in all the chlorophyll groups compared with the control group. Thus, chlorophyll administration markedly accelerated the excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners in the feces of rats administered the dioxin mixture. When the dioxin mixture was administered to rats fed the chlorophyll diet, the amounts of PCDD and PCDF congeners in the body were decreased in proportion to the chlorophyll content of the chlorophyll diet from 0.01% to 0.5%.
[GRAPH OMITTED]
Discussion
We previously reported the effect of several types of dietary fiber derived from rice bran, spinach, cabbage, corn, and carrots on dioxin excretion in feces (15). The amounts of excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners into the feces in rats fed a 10% rice bran fiber diet were 60-370% and 40-1,040% greater than those in rats fed a control diet, respectively. We have more recently reported that Chlorella enhanced dioxin excretion more markedly than rice bran fiber. The amounts of excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners in feces of rats fed a 10% Chlorella diet were 20-1,130% and 30-1,280% greater than those in rats fed a control diet, respectively (19). Moreover, we have reported that green vegetables such as spinach, perilla, and mitsuba augmented the fecal excretion of dioxin compared with vegetables such as cabbage, onion, and celery (24).
In this study, we found that the percent absorptions of TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF were 95.3-98.6% in rats, as shown in Figure 1. We thus obtained evidence that the percent absorptions of PCDD and PCDF congeners in rats resembled those in breast-fed infants. This finding is in accordance with the reports of Abraham et al. (25), Mclachlan (26), and Pluim et al. (27). However, there is a disagreement as to the percent absorption of hexa--octa CDD and CDF congeners between our findings in this study and those presented in these reports. The percent absorptions in breast-fed infants appears to be [is greater than] 95% for almost all congeners (27); therefore, in the case of breast-fed infants exposed to a lower dose of PCDD and PCDF congeners, the percent absorption of hexa--octa CDD and CDF congeners appears to be higher than that in rats exposed to a higher dose of PCDD and PCDF congeners. The present results have been recalculated to obtain nanogram TEQ values, shown in Tables 4 and 5. The amounts of fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners and the amounts of body burden of PCDD and PCDF congeners in rats fed a chlorophyll diet were greater than those of rats fed a control diet in a dose-dependent manner. The preferential effects of chlorophyll on low TEQ compounds such as 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDD and 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-octaCDF may indicate a slighter detoxification effect than that on high TEQ compounds such as TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF. These results are critical for evaluating the efficacy of chlorophyll as an agent for decreasing intake of toxic PCDD and PCDF congeners. Chlorophyll administration enhanced the fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners and reduced PCDD and PCDF congeners absorption in rats administered the dioxin mixture. However, the doses of PCDD and PCDF congeners used in this study are high, and some question remains whether chlorophyll has the same effect at low doses, which is similar to the natural background exposure to these contaminants in most countries.
Table 4. Effect of the chlorophyll diet on fecal excretion of PCDD
and PCDF congeners in rats administered the dioxin mixture.
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins ng TEQ 0(Basal diet)(a)
TCDD 10 0.43 [+ or -] 0.14
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 10 1.05 [+ or -] 0.28
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1 0.28 [+ or -] 0.06
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1 0.34 [+ or -] 0.07
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1 0.65 [+ or -] 0.09
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.1 0.12 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.002 0.0043 [+ or -] 0.0002
2,3,7,8-TCDF 1 0.03 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.5 0.07 [+ or -] 0.02
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 5 0.44 [+ or -] 0.13
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1 0.44 [+ or -] 0.07
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1 0.41 [+ or -] 0.06
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1 0.40 [+ or -] 0.06
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1 0.44 [+ or -] 0.06
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.1 0.12 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.1 0.10 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.002 0.0039 [+ or -] 0.0002
Total 33.804 5.32 [+ or -] 1.01
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.01(a)
TCDD 0.67 [+ or -] 0.17 (155.8)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 1.73 [+ or -] 0.12 (164.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 0.50 [+ or -] 0.06 (178.6)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 0.59 [+ or -] 0.07 (173.5)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.03 [+ or -] 0.12 (158.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.16 [+ or -] 0.01 (133.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0045 [+ or -] 0.0003 (104.7)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.05 [+ or -] 0.01 (166.7)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.13 [+ or -] 0.02 (185.7)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 0.78 [+ or -] 0.08 (177.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 0.83 [+ or -] 0.11 (188.6)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.73 [+ or -] 0.08 (178.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 0.65 [+ or -] 0.07 (162.5)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.81 [+ or -] 0.09 (184.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.17 [+ or -] 0.01 (141.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.14 [+ or -] 0.01 (140.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0046 [+ or -] 0.0004 (117.9)
Total 8.97 [+ or -] 0.48 (168.6)(*)
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.02(a)
TCDD 0.74 [+ or -] 0.15 (172.1)(**)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 2.18 [+ or -] 0.25 (207.6)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 0.69 [+ or -] 0.04 (246.4)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 0.78 [+ or -] 0.05 (229.4)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.43 [+ or -] 0.04 (220.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.20 [+ or -] 0.01 (166.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0057 [+ or -] 0.0003 (132.6)(*)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.05 [+ or -] 0.01 (166.7)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.19 [+ or -] 0.02 (271.4)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 1.00 [+ or -] 0.14 (227.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.09 [+ or -] 0.05 (247.7)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.98 [+ or -] 0.05 (239.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 0.88 [+ or -] 0.04 (220.0)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.11 [+ or -] 0.03 (252.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.21 [+ or -] 0.01 (175.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.17 [+ or -] 0.00 (170.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0049 [+ or -] 0.0001 (125.6)(*)
Total 11.69 [+ or -] 0.56 (219.7)(*)
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.05(a)
TCDD 0.99 [+ or -] 0.20 (230.2)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 4.14 [+ or -] 0.77 (394.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 0.95 [+ or -] 0.13 (339.3)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.08 [+ or -] 0.15 (317.6)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.71 [+ or -] 0.21 (263.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.22 [+ or -] 0.03 (183.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0052 [+ or -] 0.0008(120.9)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.08 [+ or -] 0.02 (266.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.26 [+ or -] 0.05 (371.4)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 1.81 [+ or -] 0.39 (411.4)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.45 [+ or -] 0.15 (329.5)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.38 [+ or -] 0.10 (336.6)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.25 [+ or -] 0.09 (312.5)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.47 [+ or -] 0.12 (334.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.22 [+ or -] 0.01 (183.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.19 [+ or -] 0.02 (190.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0050 [+ or -] 0.0005 (128.2)(*)
Total 17.22 [+ or -] 2.38 (323.7)(a)
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.1(a)
TCDD 1.69 [+ or -] 0.51 (393.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 6.14 [+ or -] 1.50 (584.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.42 [+ or -] 0.18 (507.1)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.60 [+ or -] 0.17 (470.6)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.98 [+ or -] 0.13 (304.6)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.25 [+ or -] 0.02 (208.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0050 [+ or -] 0.0003 (116.3)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.11 [+ or -] 0.04 (366.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.43 [+ or -] 0.08 (614.3)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 2.86 [+ or -] 0.69 (650.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.86 [+ or -] 0.09 (422.7)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.65 [+ or -] 0.15 (402.4)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.57 [+ or -] 0.15 (392.5)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.76 [+ or -] 0.15 (400.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.23 [+ or -] 0.01 (191.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.23 [+ or -] 0.02 (230.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0052 [+ or -] 0.0001 (133.3)(*)
Total 23.77 [+ or -] 3.78 (446.8)(*)
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.2(a)
TCDD 3.90 [+ or -] 1.67 (907.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 9.60 [+ or -] 2.31 (914.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.68 [+ or -] 0.21 (600.0)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.95 [+ or -] 0.22 (573.5)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 2.09 [+ or -] 0.19 (321.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.27 [+ or -] 0.02 (225.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0051 [+ or -] 0.0003 (118.6)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.29 [+ or -] 0.17 (966.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.62 [+ or -] 0.11 (885.7)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 4.76 [+ or -] 1.30 (1081.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 2.07 [+ or -] 0.21 (470.5)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.09 [+ or -] 0.27 (509.8)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.86 [+ or -] 0.24 (465.0)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.05 [+ or -] 0.20 (465.9)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.24 [+ or -] 0.01 (200.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.25 [+ or -] 0.02 (250.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0052 [+ or -] 0.0003 (133.3)(*)
Total 33.71 [+ or -] 6.93 (633.6)(*)
Chlorophyll diet (%)
Dioxins 0.5(a)
TCDD 5.87 [+ or -] 2.48 (1365.1)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 13.11 [+ or -] 2.09 (1248.6)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.95 [+ or -] 0.19 (696.4)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 2.39 [+ or -] 0.12 (702.9)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 2.41 [+ or -] 0.10 (370.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.27 [+ or -] 0.01 (225.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0049 [+ or -] 0.0004 (114.0)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.52 [+ or -] 0.23 (1773.3)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.84 [+ or -] 0.12 (1200.0)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 6.91 [+ or -] 1.44 (1570.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 2.33 [+ or -] 0.19 (529.5)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.27 [+ or -] 0.13 (553.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 2.17 [+ or -] 0.21 (542.5)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.27 [+ or -] 0.16 (515.9)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.26 [+ or -] 0.02 (216.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.27 [+ or -] 0.01 (270.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0055 [+ or -] 0.0001 (141)(*)
Total 43.83 [+ or -] 6.63 (823.9)(*)
Values represent the mean [+ or -] SD (n = 4).
(a) Values represent the percent fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF
congeners from days 1 to 5 against total nanograms of TEQ values
in rats administered PCDD and PCDF congeners; the acceleration
index of fecal excretion (shown in parentheses) equals (the
percent fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF congeners of rats in the
chlorophyll diet)/(the percent fecal excretion of PCDD and PCDF
congeners of rats in the control diet) x 100.
(*) Significantly different from basal group (p < 0.01).
(**) Significantly different from basal group (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Effect of body burden of PCDD and PCDF congeners
in rats administered the dioxin mixture.
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins ng TEQ 0(Basal diet)(a)
TCDD 10 27.52 [+ or -] 0.81
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 10 27.86 [+ or -] 2.64
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1 2.65 [+ or -] 0.22
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1 2.50 [+ or -] 0.08
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1 2.23 [+ or -] 0.23
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.1 0.17 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.002 0.0014 [+ or -] 0.0002
2,3,7,8-TCDF 1 0.73 [+ or -] 0.16
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.5 0.73 [+ or -] 0.16
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 5 14.14 [+ or -] 0.83
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1 2.55 [+ or -] 0.15
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1 2.47 [+ or -] 0.19
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1 2.16 [+ or -] 0.28
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1 2.41 [+ or -] 0.16
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.1 0.13 [+ or -] 0.02
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.1 0.19 [+ or -] 0.01
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.002 0.0012 [+ or -] 0.0002
Total 33.804 88.44 [+ or -] 5.33
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.01(a)
TCDD 26.57 [+ or -] 1.67 (96.5)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 25.69 [+ or -] 2.32 (92.2)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 2.32 [+ or -] 0.16 (87.5)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 2.15 [+ or -] 0.10 (86.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.79 [+ or -] 0.16 (80.3)(**)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.11 [+ or -] 0.02 (64.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0007 [+ or -] 0.0001 (50.0)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.76 [+ or -] 0.11 (104.1)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.59 [+ or -] 0.14 (80.8)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 13.62 [+ or -] 0.29 (96.3)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 2.04 [+ or -] 0.13 (80.0)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.09 [+ or -] 0.12 (84.6)(**)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.85 [+ or -] 0.21 (85.6)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 2.13 [+ or -] 0.17 (88.4)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.08 [+ or -] 0.01 (61.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.13 [+ or -] 0.01 (68.4)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0007 [+ or -] 0.0001 (58.3)
Total 81.91 [+ or -] 3.86 (92.6)
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.02(a)
TCDD 26.67 [+ or -] 0.44 (96.9)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 25.13 [+ or -] 1.27 (90.2)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 2.22 [+ or -] 0.04 (83.8)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.98 [+ or -] 0.05 (79.2)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.51 [+ or -] 0.08 (67.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.08 [+ or -] 0.00 (47.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0005 [+ or -] 0.0001 (35.7)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.83 [+ or -] 0.16 (113.7)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.66 [+ or -] 0.11 (90.4)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 12.54 [+ or -] 0.58 (88.7)(**)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.81 [+ or -] 0.05 (71.0)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.88 [+ or -] 0.10 (76.1)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.70 [+ or -] 0.16 (78.7)(**)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.76 [+ or -] 0.05 (73.0)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.06 [+ or -] 0.00 (46.2)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.11 [+ or -] 0.00 (57.9)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0005 [+ or -] 0.0000 (41.7)
Total 78.91 [+ or -] 2.55 (89.2)(**)
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.05(a)
TCDD 26.16 [+ or -] 1.59 (95.1)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 22.21 [+ or -] 1.53 (79.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.75 [+ or -] 0.18 (66.0)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.65 [+ or -] 0.22 (66.0)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 1.05 [+ or -] 0.09 (47.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.05 [+ or -] 0.01 (29.4)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0003 [+ or -] 0.0001 (21.4)(**)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.90 [+ or -] 0.16 (123.3)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.52 [+ or -] 0.11 (71.2)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 11.25 [+ or -] 1.03 (79.6)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.23 [+ or -] 0.13 (48.2)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.40 [+ or -] 0.12 (56.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.21 [+ or -] 0.13 (56.0)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.20 [+ or -] 0.14 (49.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.04 [+ or -] 0.01 (30.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.07 [+ or -] 0.01 (36.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0003 [+ or -] 0.0002 (25.0)(*)
Total 70.68 [+ or -] 3.73 (79.9)(*)
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.1(a)
TCDD 25.46 [+ or -] 1.26 (92.5)(**)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 19.93 [+ or -] 1.17 (71.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.37 [+ or -] 0.19 (51.7)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 1.32 [+ or -] 0.16 (52.8)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 0.81 [+ or -] 0.15 (36.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.04 [+ or -] 0.01 (23.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0004 [+ or -] 0.0001 (28.6)(*)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.73 [+ or -] 0.08 (100.0)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.48 [+ or -] 0.13 (65.8)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 10.57 [+ or -] 0.66 (74.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 1.01 [+ or -] 0.12 (39.6)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 1.08 [+ or -] 0.17 (43.7)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 1.02 [+ or -] 0.18 (47.2)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.99 [+ or -] 0.15 (41.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.03 [+ or -] 0.01 (23.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.05 [+ or -] 0.01 (26.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0004 [+ or -] 0.0001 (33.3)(*)
Total 64.88 [+ or -] 3.86 (73.4)(*)
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.2(a)
TCDD 24.09 [+ or -] 2.52 (87.5)(**)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 17.77 [+ or -] 1.84 (63.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 1.01 [+ or -] 0.19 (38.1)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 0.96 [+ or -] 0.15 (38.4)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 0.63 [+ or -] 0.19 (28.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.03 [+ or -] 0.01 (17.6)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0004 [+ or -] 0.0003 (28.6)(*)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.94 [+ or -] 0.20 (128.8)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.47 [+ or -] 0.14 (64.4)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 9.31 [+ or -] 1.07 (65.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 0.69 [+ or -] 0.14 (27.1)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.80 [+ or -] 0.19 (32.4)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 0.78 [+ or -] 0.20 (36.1)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.73 [+ or -] 0.16 (30.3)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.02 [+ or -] 0.01 (15.4)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.04 [+ or -] 0.02 (21.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0003 [+ or -] 0.0003 (25.0)(**)
Total 58.25 [+ or -] 6.41 (65.9)(*)
Chlorophyll diet
Dioxins 0.5(a)
TCDD 22.31 [+ or -] 1.69 (81.1)(*)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD 14.19 [+ or -] 2.57 (50.9)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD 0.71 [+ or -] 0.19 (26.8)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD 0.62 [+ or -] 0.11 (24.8)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD 0.41 [+ or -] 0.13 (18.4)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD 0.02 [+ or -] 0.01 (11.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDD 0.0002 [+ or -] 0.0001 (14.3)(*)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.93 [+ or -] 0.12 (127.4)
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF 0.33 [+ or -] 0.10 (45.2)(*)
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF 7.61 [+ or -] 0.96 (53.8)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF 0.44 [+ or -] 0.12 (17.3)(*)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.51 [+ or -] 0.13 (20.6)(*)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF 0.48 [+ or -] 0.13 (22.2)(*)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF 0.46 [+ or -] 0.13 (19.1)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF 0.01 [+ or -] 0.01 (7.7)(*)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF 0.02 [+ or -] 0.01 (10.5)(*)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OctaCDF 0.0001 [+ or -] 0.0001 (8.3)(*)
Total 49.04 [+ or -] 5.84 (55.5)(*)
Values represent the mean [+ or -] SD (n= 4).
(a) Each value represents percent body burden of PCDD and PCDF
congeners against total nanograms of TEQ values in rats
administered PCDD and PCDF congeners; acceleration index of
disappearance from the body (shown in parentheses) equals
(percent body burden of PCDD and PCDF congeners of rats fed
the chlorophyll diet)/(percent body burden of PCDD and PCDF
congeners of rats fed the control diet) x 100.
(*) Significantly different from basal group (p < 0.01).
(**) Significantly different from basal group (p < 0.05).
Chlorella and green vegetables contain large amounts of chlorophyll. The most effective compound in Chlorella cells and green vegetables for promoting the fecal excretion of dioxin is likely to be chlorophyll. In this study, the amounts of fecal excretion of TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF, which are highly toxic, in rats fed the 0.2% chlorophyll diet were 807%, 814%, and 982% greater than those of the control group, respectively. The amounts of fecal excretion of TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF in rats fed a 10% Chlorella diet were 1,130%, 560%, and 800% greater than those of the control group, respectively (19).
The chlorophyll content of the 10% Chlorella diet was 0.2% because the content of chlorophyll in the Chlorella cells used in the diet preparation was 2%. These data imply that the effective substance for suppressing the dioxin absorption in Chlorella cells is chlorophyll. A 10% Chlorella diet augmented the fecal excretion of TCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-pentaCDD, and 2,3,4,7,8-pentaCDF already absorbed in tissues by 350%, 180%, and 250%, respectively, compared to control rats. In future studies using chlorophyll derived from Chlorella, we will attempt to obtain data on the excretion of dioxin stored in the body. Moreover, it will be necessary to study the effectiveness of chlorophyll derived from green vegetables instead of from Chlorella on the fecal excretion of dioxin. Chlorophyll is considered to have the therapeutic potential of inhibiting dioxin reabsorption similarly to Chlorella administration, and we hypothesize that chlorophyll will augment dioxin excretion from the body as a result of accelerating fecal dioxin excretion.
The mechanism by which chlorophyll stimulates dioxin excretion from the body is unclear. Sassa et al. (28) reported that the addition of hemin ([10.sup.-5] M) to liver cell cultures completely abolished the induction of uroporphyrin formation by 3,3',4,4'-tetra-chlorobiphenyl (TCB), suggesting that the uroporphyrin induction response may be regulated by the availability of heme in the liver cell. These results represent the structure-activity relationship of the dioxin in relation to porphyrin formation and provide support for the existence of the specific structure-activity relationships that allow this response to occur. It was reported that chlorophyllin, a chlorophyll derivative, formed complexes with heterocyclic amines (17,18) and exhibited potent antimutagenic activity. Chlorophyllin may form a complex with dioxins with a planar structure, leading to reduced biotoxicity. The toxicity of dioxin involves reacting with the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor. TCDD causes transcriptional activation of the cytochrome P450 genes via their interaction with the Ah receptor (29,30). It was reported that the chlorophyll from vegetables inhibited cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases (31). Eating foods such as Chlorella, green vegetables, and seaweeds containing chlorophyll and dietary fiber seems to protect against health disorders caused by dioxin exposure in humans by capturing dioxin in the digestive tract and by diminishing the amount of dioxin absorption. These foods serve as a first line of defense against dioxins by acting as interceptor molecules. Chlorella, green vegetables, and seaweeds may be useful in promoting the excretion of dioxin from the body.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
(1.) Poland A, Knutson JC. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: examination of the mechanism of toxicity. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 22:517-554 (1982).
(2.) Schecter A, Startin J, Wright C, Kelly M, Papke O, Lis A, Ball M, Olson J. Dioxins in U.S. food and estimated daily intake. Chemosphere 29:2261-2265 (1994).
(3.) Mclachlan MS. Bioaccumulation of hydrophobic chemicals in agricultural food chains. Environ Sci Technol 30:252-259 (1996).
(4.) Toyoda M, Uchibe H, Yanagi T, Keno Y, Hori T, Iida T. Dietary daily intake of PCDDs, PCDFS and coplanar PCBs by total diet study in Japan. J Food Hyg Sec Jpn 40:98-110 (1999).
(5.) Takayama K, Miyata H, Mimura M, Kashimoto T. PCDDs, PCDFs and coplanar PCBs in coastal and marketing fishes in Japan. Jpn J Toxicol Environ Health 37:125-131 (1991).
(6.) Poiger H, Schlatter C. Pharmacokinetics of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in man. Chemosphere 15:1489-1494 (1966).
(7.) Rose JQ, Ramsey JC, Wentzler TH, Hummel RA, Gehring PJ. The fate of 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin following single and repeated oral doses to the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 36:209-226 (1976).
(8.) Brewster DW, Birnbaum LS. Disposition and excretion of 2,3,4,7, 8-pentachlorodibenzofuran in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 90:243-252 (1987).
(9.) Wolfe WH, Michalek JE, Miner JC, Pirkle JL, Caudill SP, Patterson DG, Needham LL. Determinants of TCDD half-life in veterans of operation ranch hand. J Toxicol Environ Health 41:481-468 (1994).
(10.) Masuda Y. Approach to risk assessment of chlorinated dioxins from Yusho PCB poisoning. Chemosphere 32:583-594 (1996).
(11.) Yoshimura T, Hayabuchi H. Relationship between the amount of rice oil ingested by patients with Yusho and their subjective symptoms. Environ Health Perspect 59:47-51 (1985).
(12.) Olson JR. Metabolism and disposition of 2,3,7,8-tetra-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in guinea pigs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 85:263-273 (1986).
(13.) Morita K, Hirakawa H, Matsueda T, Iida T, Tokiwa H. Stimulating effect of dietary fiber on fecal excretion of polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD)in rats. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 84:273-281 (1993).
(14.) Morita K, Matsueda T, Iida T. Effect of dietary fiber on fecal excretion and liver distribution of PCDF in rats. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 86:218-225 (1995).
(15.) Morita K, Matsueda T, Iida T. Effect of dietary fiber on fecal excretion of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in rats. Jpn J Toxicol Environ Health 43:35-41 (1997).
(16.) Baxter JH. Absorption of chlorophyll phytol in normal man and in patients with Refsum's disease. J Lipid Res 9:636-641 (1968).
(17.) Dashwood RH. Protection by chlorophyllin against the covalent binding of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoline (IQ) to rat liver DNA. Carcinogenesis 13:113-118 (1992).
(18.) Guo D, Herman HAJ, Davis CD, Snyderwine EG, Bailey GS, Dashwood RH. Protection by chlorophyllin and indole-3-carbinol against 2-amino-l-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4, 5-b] pyridine (PhIP)-induced DNA adducts and colonic aberrant crypts in the F344 rat. Carcinogenesis 16:2931-2937 (1995).
(19.) Morita K, Matsueda T, Iida T, Hasegawa T. Chlorella accelerates dioxin excretion in rats. J Nutr 129:1731-1736 (1999).
(20.) Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 7th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
(21.) Iriyama K, Ogura N, Takamiya A. A simple method for extraction and partial purification of chlorophyll from plant material, using dioxane. J Biochem 76:901-904 (1974).
(22.) Birnbaum LS, Decad GM, Matthews HB. Disposition and excretion of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 55:342-352 (1980).
(23.) Brewster DW, Birnbaum LS. Disposition of 1,2,3,7,6-pentachlorodibenzofuran in the rat. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 95:490-498 (1988).
(24.) Morita K, Matsueda T, Iida T. Effect of green vegetable on digestive tract absorption of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in rats. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 90:171-183 (1999).
(25.) Abraham K, Hille A, Ende M, Helge H. Intake and fecal excretion of PCDDs, PCDFs, HCB and PCBs (138, 153, 180) in a breast-fed and formula-fed infant. Chemosphere 29:2279-2286 (1994).
(26.) Mclachlan MS. Digestive tract absorption of polychlorihated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls in a nursing infant. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 123:68-72 (1993).
(27.) Pluim H J, Wever J, Koppe JG, Slikke vd JW, Olie K. Intake and faecal excretion of chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans in breast-fed infants at different ages. Chemosphere 26:1947-1952 (1993).
(28.) Sassa S, Verneuil H, Kappas A. Inhibition of uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase activity in polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbon poisoning. In: Biological Mechanisms of Dioxin Action. Banbury Report 18. Cold Spring Harbor, NY:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1985;215-224.
(29.) Kohn MC, Lucier GW, Clark GC, Sewall C, Tritscher AM, Portier C J. A mechanistic model of effects of dioxin on gene expression in the rat liver. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 120:138-154 (1993).
(30.) Christou M, Savas U, Schroeder S, Shen X, Thompson T, Gould MN, Jefcoate CR. Cytochromes CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in the rat mammary gland: cell-specific expression and regulation by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and hormones. Mol Cell Endocrinol 115:41-50 (1995).
(31.) Edenharder R, Leopold C, Kries M. Modifying actions of solvent extracts from fruit and vegetable residues on 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MelQx)induced mutagenesis in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98. Mutat Res 341:303-318 (1995)
Kunimasa Morita,(1) Masahiro Ogata,(2) and Takashi Hasegawa(2)
(1) Fukuoka Institute of Health and Environmental Sciences, Dazaifu City, Japan; (2) Research Laboratories, Chlorella Industry Co., Ltd., Chikugo City, Japan
Address correspondence to T. Hasegawa, Research Laboratories, Chlorella Industry Co., Ltd., 1343 Hisatomi, Chikugo City, Fukuoka 833-0056, Japan. Telephone: +81-942-52-2191 (ext. 24). Fax: +81-942-51-1266. E-mail: hasegawa@chlorella.co.jp
This study was supported by grants to K. Morita from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan.
Received 5 July 2000; accepted 24 October 2000.
COPYRIGHT 2001 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group