We test 17 new drivers : Using robots and real golfers, we analyze clubs for shot shape and trajectory tendencies - Evaluation - Statistical Data Included
Peter FarrickerChances are you have stood on the tee, watched your playing partner rip one down the fairway and then borrowed that same club to give it a try. Sometimes the result is another center- cut bomb; other times the ball flies so far out-of-bounds all you can do is laugh. The culprit is often the club, not the swing. Not all drivers work identically. They may look similar and cost approximately the same, but like computers, cars and most other high-priced toys, the differences between drivers can be both subtle and immense.
If you're like most golfers, you don't have access to the high-tech gadgetry used by tour pros to measure the critical elements for successful driving: spin rate, ball speed and launch angle. In light of that, Golf Digest has, for the third time, put 17 drivers through extensive testing--both robotic and player testing--to help determine the relative performance tendencies of each driver. The chart on the following pages is not a ranking system of drivers, but rather a breakdown of the relative performance tendencies of the clubs. The chart should be used as a starting point in your search for a new driver.
Other magazines use strictly player testing, in which a small player pool comments on feel, looks and performance. We believe this methodology is overly subjective and omits the scientific analysis necessary for a fully informed buying decision.
The tests we performed are more objective and quantitative. In addition to the robotic testing, in which we compared every driver to a pair of GOLF DIGEST baseline clubs, we had more than 100 golfers of various handicap abilities (1 through 21) hit the drivers. The shot shape and trajectory for every single shot was noted. After analyzing all the data, we categorized a "relative performance tendency" for each driver based on these player and robotic tests.
We also measured each shaft for flex and torque to come up with an overall-stiffness ranking (softer, soft, medium, stiff and very stiff). It is not uncommon for one company's stiff shaft to be more flexible than another company's regular shaft. The overall stiffness ranking used here is a unique feature of this test and cannot be found anywhere else.
Case study
Many drivers performed the same in the robotic and player testing. Others, however, had dissimilar performances. One driver, for instance, hit a slight draw on the robot, but clearly produced a more left-to-right flight with the live testing. Players obviously had more trouble closing the face with this driver than did the robot. Three reasons: shaft stiffness (flex plays a larger role for a person than for a robot), clubhead size (the robot's strong downswing can close the face easier on a driver with a larger clubhead), and alignment (the unique design of this particular driver made inconsistent face alignment at address more common for the player).
"Those differences [between robot and players] don't surprise me," says Callaway's Dick Helmstetter. "A robot operator completely controls the face angle, and the robot has, essentially, unlimited strength. Players have other problems, like insufficient strength to overcome a club's tendencies."
Now take a close look at the accompanying chart to see which drivers might improve your game.
How 17 drivers stack up
Club specifications of sample clubs measured by the Golf Digest
Technical Panel
How to use this chart The colored boxes describe the
drivers' tendencies from live testing. Someone
seeking a high draw, for instance, should look for
high trajectory and a draw curvature.
Driver tendencies
SHAFT
FLEX Trajectory Curvature Stiffness
Adams SC R Low Draw Medium
Series Fade S Medium Straight Very Stiff
Control
Suggested
retail
price: $370
Armour R Medium Fade Very Soft
845s S Low Draw Medium
Titanium
$208
Callaway R Medium Straight Soft
GBB S Medium Fade Medium
Hawk Eye
$500
Cleveland R Low Draw Very Soft
QuadPro S Low Straight Soft
$250
Cobra R Medium Fade Soft
Gravity S High Straight Medium
Back
$375
Liquid- R Medium Fade Stiff
metal Pure S Medium Straight Stiff
Energy
Transfer
$665
MacGregor R Medium Straight Very Soft
Tourney S Medium Draw Stiff
Titanium
$430
McHenry R Medium Fade Medium
Metals S Medium Fade Medium
TourPure
$500
Mizuno R Medium Draw Very Soft
T-Zoid T3 S High Straight Soft
Pro
Titanium
$434
Orlimar R Medium Draw Medium
TriMetal S High ` Fade Stiff
$270
Ping TiSI R High Fade Very Soft
Titanium S High Fade Very Stiff
$495
Snake Eyes R High Straight Medium
Elasteel S Low Draw Very Stiff
$200
Taylor Made R Medium Straight Stiff
FireSole S Medium Draw Very Stiff
Titanium
$399
Titleist R Low Draw Soft
Titanium S Medium Straight Stiff
975D
$500
Wilson R High Fade Soft
Fat Shaft Ti S High Straight Very Stiff
Super
Oversize
$425
Wright R High Straight Very Soft
Poweright S High Fade Medium
Titanium
Xtreme
$300
Yonex R Low Straight Medium
Rekin Super S High Fade Medium
03
$395
Loft Swing- Face Length
Weight angle (inches)
Adams SC R 10.5 [degrees] D-2 2.75 [degrees] 45
Series Fade closed
Control S 10.5 [degrees] D-2 1.5 [degrees] 44 31/44
Suggested closed
retail
price: $370
Armour R 11 [degrees] D-0 .25 [degrees] 44 11/48
845s open
Titanium S 11 [degrees] C-9 2 [degrees] 44 11/48
$208 open
Callaway R 10 [degrees] C-9 1 [degree] 45
GBB closed
Hawk Eye S 10 [degrees] D-1 .75 [degrees] 45
$500 closed
Cleveland R 10.5 [degrees] D-2 .5 [degrees] 44 11/44
QuadPro closed
$250 S 10.5 [degrees] D-2 2.5 44 11/44
open
Cobra R 10 [degrees] D-2 1 [degree] 45
Gravity closed
Back S 10.5 [degrees] D-2 .5 [degrees] 45
$375 closed
Liquid- R 11 [degrees] D-6 .5 [degrees] 45 11/44
metal Pure open
Energy S 10 [degrees] D-5 .5 [degrees] 45 11/44
Transfer closed
$665
MacGregor R 11.5 [degrees] D-4 2 [degrees] 45 11/44
Tourney closed
Titanium S 10 [degrees] C-7 2 [degrees] 45
$430 closed
McHenry R 11 [degrees] D-6 .5 [degrees] 44 71/48
Metals closed
TourPure S 11 [degrees] D-5 .5 [degrees] 44 71/48
$500 closed
Mizuno R 9.5 [degrees] D-6 1 [degree] 45 71/48
T-Zoid T3 closed
Pro S 10 [degrees] D-6 .5 [degrees] 46
Titanium closed
$434
Orlimar R 10.5 [degrees] D-3 .75 [degrees] 44 31/44
TriMetal closed
$270 S 10.5 [degrees] D-5 Square 45
Ping TiSI R 10 [degrees] D-2 Square 45 11/44
Titanium S 10 [degrees] D-2 Square 45 11/44
$495
Snake Eyes R 10 [degrees] D-2 Square 44 11/42
Elasteel S 9 [degrees] D-2 Square 44 11/42
$200
Taylor Made R 10 [degrees] D-5 .25 [degrees] 44 31/44
FireSole open
Titanium S 11 [degrees] D-6 1 [degree] 44 31/44
$399 closed
Titleist R 10.5 [degrees] D-4 .75 [degrees] 44 71/48
Titanium open
975D S 10.5 [degrees] D-1 Square 44 51/48
$500
Wilson R 10.5 [degrees] C-9 1 [degree] 45
Fat Shaft Ti closed
Super Over- S 10.5 [degrees] D-0 1 [degree] 45
Size Closed
$425
Wright R 11 [degrees] D-1 .5 [degrees] 44 71/48
Poweright closed
Titanium S 10 [degrees] D-4 .25 [degrees] 44 71/48
Xtreme closed$300
Yonex R 10.5 [degrees] D-0 Square 45
Rekin Super S 10.5 [degrees] D-1 .75 [degrees] 45
03 closed
$395
Manufacturer comments
Golf Digest has refined its testing procedure by
supplementing robotic testing with live testing.
The live testers varied in ability from a
1-handicapper to a 21.
Listed below are comments from the manufacturers
concerning their respective drivers.
Adams SC Adams' SC Series features four models: Hook control,
Series Fade Neutral, Fade Control (the club tested) and Fade
Control Control Plus. "This is the first-ever series of four
Suggested drivers that feature a precisely manufactured
retail asymmetrical [uneven] face-curvature system," says
price: $370 the company.
Armour The 845s driver uses a lightweight titanium face
845s insert in a stainless- steel shell, which allows for
Titanium a bigger clubhead and increased perimeter weighting.
$208 "The result is a metal wood with an oversize sweet
spot and a high moment of inertia, producing less
twist at impact and maximum forgiveness," says the
company.
Callaway The Hawk Eye driver combines a thin titanium crown
GBB plate, a lightweight titanium body and a tungsten plug
Hawk Eye in the sole to lower the center of gravity. "The
$500 position of the Tungsten Gravity Screw on the driver
[back toward the heel] helps the average golfer bring
the clubhead back to square at impact more easily,"
says the company.
Cleveland The QuadPro features a thin maraging-steel face, a
QuadPro copper face ring to reduce and isolate harsh vibrations
$250 and a copper-tungsten back weight to make the center of
gravity low and deep for more stability and accuracy.
"Its unique design and weight placement give it truly
remarkable performance even on off-center hits," says the
company.
Cobra "The Gravity Back driver uses a bi-metal construction
Gravity that allows the center of gravity to be moved lower and
Back farther back," says the company. "Moving the CG back helps
$375 increase the dynamic loft of the club, which makes it
easier to get the ball up in the air." The stronger-lofted
models feature deeper clubfaces.
Liquid- The Pure Energy Transfer driver combines a titanium shell
metal Pure and a Liquidmetal face insert. "Liquidmetal is two to
Energy three times stronger than titanium or stainless steel and
Transfer has a greater ability to dampen vibration than titanium or
$665 stainless steel," says the company.
MacGregor The Tourney driver is available in four lofts and
Tourney features a four-way roll face that helps optimize
Titanium ball-flight correction on mis-hits. "The low-drag
$430 rail sole enhances playability, and internal stabilizing
bars strengthen the head and help reduce
vibrations," says the company.
McHenry The TourPure driver uses multi-metal technology: a
Metals lightweight titanium clubhead, a thin beta-titanium face
TourPure insert and a strategically placed 16-gram tungsten/copper
$500 power ring on the back of the clubhead for greater
stability.
Mizuno "The T3 Pro has an ultra-wide sweet spot suitable for all
T-Zoid T3 types of players," says the company. A modified T-Zoid
Pro power bar provides "maximum vertical structural integrity
Titanium of the head, producing a more rigid head and maximum
$434 initial velocity."
Orlimar The TriMetal driver incorporates the same
TriMetal three metals as the company's fairway woods:
$270 a stainless-steel head, an alpha-maraging face
twice as strong as titanium and copper/tungsten
weights on the sole to promote stability
on mis-hits and lower the center of gravity.
Ping TiSI At 323cc displacement, the TiSI is the largest
Titanium totally custom-fit titanium driver available.
$495 "The structurally rigid clubhead is designed to
reduce deformation at impact and transfer more
energy to the ball for longer tee shots," says
the company. The multi-functional JX hosel is
designed to offer 10 custom-fitting options.
Snake Eyes "The Snake Eyes Elasteel is the only family of
Elasteel drivers in the game that is computer engineered to
$200 have a different face thickness for different swing
speeds," says the company. The purpose is to maximize
face deflection for different levels of playing ability.
Taylor Made The FireSole driver features a tungsten sole plug
FireSole positioned directly behind the sweet spot for a low
Titanium center of gravity that reduces backspin and produces the
$399 proper launch angle.The clubhead's crown has been
stiffened to eliminate crown flexing for greater
stability at impact.
Titleist "The 975D is designed to manage the strength and
Titanium weight benefits of titanium and to create shots that
975D fly with a harder, more penetrating trajectory," says
$500 the company. This model features a deep-face pear shape
that appeals to serious players' preference for clean
lines and classic designs.
Wilson The Fat Shaft Ti Super Oversize features one of the
Fat Shaft Ti largest driver faces available (33cm2). "The increased
Super Over- size is located where it is most needed, in the face, so
Size $425 the larger clubhead is able to maintain a classic design
and shape," says the company
Wright The Poweright Xtreme is designed for golfers of all skill
Poweright levels. "The club has a huge sweet spot for easy hitting
Titanium and minimizing loss of distance on off-center hits. A
Xtreme patent-pending weighting system produces optimal
$300 trajectory and spin ratio," says the company.
Yonex The Rekin Super 03 features a forged titanium face, a
Rekin Super tungsten insert in the sole for a lower and deeper center
03 of gravity and an enlarged sweet spot for added
$395 forgiveness. Available in 9- and 10.5-degree lofts. For
golfers with slow to moderate swing speeds.
KEY:
Shaft flex
R Regular flex
S Stiff flex
Trajectory: Describes ball flight during live testing: Low, Medium
and High.
Curvature: Describes shot-shape tendency from the live testing:
Draw, Straight and Fade.
Stiffness: The flex and torque of each shaft (R & S combined) for an
overall stiffness rating.
All of the robotic comparisons in the testing were done in relation
to a Golf Digest test club, which was assembled with components using
the average specifications from the sample drivers
RELATED ARTICLE: Man versus machine
GOLF DIGEST is using a combination of robotic and player testing in our "club tendency" recommendations. When there is a discrepancy, we side with the player testing. Many major club manufacturers use this same method.
Callaway uses a 70/30 player-robot ratio. "Players are used for distance and dispersion tests, comparisons with existing drivers and other 'touchy-feely' variations," says Callaway's Dick Helmstetter. "Robots are used for face-mapping, USGA rebound-velocity tests and to see how different balls react."
Taylor Made uses both to test its driv-ers for durability, performance and perception. "The purpose is to predict how a club will work for the consumer," says Taylor Made's Dick Rugge. "Robots predict how a club will work for a robot. But robots don't play golf. Golfers play golf."
The key is rigorous statistical analysis of a wide variety of golfers, which we have done and which is presented here.
RELATED ARTICLE: How to read the driver chart on the following pages
This third installment of driver testing is a departure from our two previous tests (Golf Digest, February 1997 and June 1997). This time, instead of having players assess their games and choose a driver accordingly, we assess the drivers' general tendencies through robotic and player testing. To use this chart, know what you want in a driver--a quick fix or an enhancement of your present game--and then find the corresponding models that will best suit your swing.
COPYRIGHT 1999 New York Times Company Magazine Group, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Gale Group