出版社：Liberalni Institut, University of Economics, Prague
摘要：Wittgenstein’s rule-following paradox has important implications for two aspects
of Austrian theory. First, it makes it possible to reconcile the Misesian, Rothbardian,
and hermeneutical approaches to methodology; second, it provides a way of
defending a stateless legal order against the charge that such an order lacks, yet needs, a
final arbiter.
