首页    期刊浏览 2024年10月06日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Nonmarket Economic Valuation and "The Economist’s Fallacy"
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Murray A Rudd
  • 期刊名称:Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
  • 印刷版ISSN:1556-8180
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:6
  • 期号:11
  • 页码:112-115
  • 出版社:The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University
  • 摘要:It is important that noneconomists understand and consider three key points regarding the use of economic cost-benefit analysis. First, economists undertaking applied cost-benefit analyses use expected values by necessity in forward-looking models. Second, economists tally changes in economic value, comparing ¡°with¡± and ¡°without¡± investment scenarios, using producer and consumer surplus. Third, marginal changes in the ¡°nonmarket¡± components of consumer surplus can, and should, be quantified in monetary terms and included in evaluations whenever possible. These three factors highlight the need for multidisciplinary research on complex problems relating public investments to the social, cultural, health, and environmental impacts of those investments.
  • 关键词:cost-benefit analysis, nonmarket valuation, stated preferences; public goods; opportunity costs
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有