摘要：The central issue in this appeal is whether
the trial court’s decision to set aside the
revocation of Hollis’ driver’s license, based on
a finding that Hollis was mentally incapable of
giving a knowing and conscious refusal to
submit to a blood/breath alcohol test, is
supported by sufficient evidence. We hold the
trial court erred as a matter of law in finding
Hollis presented sufficient evidence to prove
his incapacity to give a knowing refusal to
test.
