标题：THE TRIAL COURT’S SUMMARY
DISPOSITION OF THE ACTION IN
FAVOR OF INSURANCE COMPANY IS
REVERSED AND THE CAUSE IS
REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
THIS COURT’S PRONOUNCEMENT
摘要：Two questions are posed in this controversy
for our review: (1) Is Equity Insurance
Company’s policy provision that deals with
cancellation for nonpayment of a premium
ambiguous? If so, did defendant tender proof
that would raise a question of fact as to when
notice of the policy’s cancellation must be submitted
to the insured? (2) Do the terms of the
Oklahoma Consumer Credit Protection Code,
14A O.S. 2001 § 4-304,2 apply to insurance
agreements in which installment payments for
coverage are acceptable? We answer the first
question in the negative but reverse the trial
court’s judgment on other grounds. Because
