标题：Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.
摘要：Recent research has shown that the noncontingent delivery of competing stimuli can effectively reduce rates of destructive behavior maintained by social-positive reinforcement, even when the contingency for destructive behavior remains intact. It may be useful, therefore, to have a systematic means for predicting which reinforcers do and do not compete successfully with the reinforcer that is maintaining destructive behavior. In the present study, we conducted a brief competing stimulus assessment in which noncontingent access to a variety of tangible stimuli (one toy per trial) was superimposed on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule of attention for destructive behavior for individuals whose behavior was found to be reinforced by attention during a functional analysis. Tangible stimuli that resulted in the lowest rates of destructive behavior and highest percentages of engagement during the competing stimulus assessment were subsequently used in a noncontingent tangible items plus extinction treatment package and were compared to noncontingent attention plus extinction and extinction alone. Results indicated that both treatments resulted in greater reductions in the target behavior than did extinction alone and suggested that the competing stimulus assessment may be helpful in predicting stimuli that can enhance the effects of extinction when noncontingent attention is unavailable. DESCRIPTORS: Attention-maintained problem behavior, competing stimuli, extinction, functional analysis, noncontingent reinforcement Full Text The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (200K). Selected References These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article. Bowman LG, Fisher WW, Thompson RH, Piazza CC. On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer; 30 (2):251–265. [ PubMed ] DeLeon IG, Iwata BA. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter; 29 (4):519–533. [ PubMed ] Fischer SM, Iwata BA, Mazaleski JL. Noncontingent delivery of arbitrary reinforcers as treatment for self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer; 30 (2):239–249. [ PubMed ] Fisher WW, O'Connor JT, Kurtz PF, DeLeon IG, Gotjen DL. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring; 33 (1):79–83. [ PubMed ] Fisher W, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, Hagopian LP, Owens JC, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer; 25 (2):491–498. [ PubMed ] Goh HL, Iwata BA. Behavioral persistence and variability during extinction of self-injury maintained by escape. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring; 27 (1):173–174. [ PubMed ] Green Leonard, Freed Debra E. The substitutability of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul; 60 (1):141–158. [ PubMed ] Hagopian LP, Fisher WW, Legacy SM. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer; 27 (2):317–325. [ PubMed ] Hanley GP, Piazza CC, Fisher WW. Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer; 30 (2):229–237. [ PubMed ] Iwata BA, Dorsey MF, Slifer KJ, Bauman KE, Richman GS. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer; 27 (2):197–209. [ PubMed ] Iwata BA, Duncan BA, Zarcone JR, Lerman DC, Shore BA. A sequential, test-control methodology for conducting functional analyses of self-injurious behavior. Behav Modif. 1994 Jul; 18 (3):289–306. [ PubMed ] Iwata BA, Pace GM, Cowdery GE, Miltenberger RG. What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring; 27 (1):131–144. [ PubMed ] Lalli JS, Casey SD, Kates K. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring; 30 (1):127–137. [ PubMed ] Lerman DC, Iwata BA. A methodology for distinguishing between extinction and punishment effects associated with response blocking. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer; 29 (2):231–233. [ PubMed ] Piazza CC, Fisher WW, Hanley GP, LeBlanc LA, Worsdell AS, Lindauer SE, Keeney KM. Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer; 31 (2):165–189. [ PubMed ] Piazza Cathleen C, Patel Meeta R, Gulotta Charles S, Sevin Bari M, Layer Stacy A. On the relative contributions of positive reinforcement and escape extinction in the treatment of food refusal. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall; 36 (3):309–324. [ PubMed ] Piazza Cathleen C, Roane Henry S, Keeney Kris M, Boney Bobbi R, Abt Kimberly A. Varying response effort in the treatment of pica maintained by automatic reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall; 35 (3):233–246. [ PubMed ] Shore BA, Iwata BA, DeLeon IG, Kahng S, Smith RG. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring; 30 (1):21–41. [ PubMed ] Vollmer TR, Borrero JC, Wright CS, Van Camp C, Lalli JS. Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Fall; 34 (3):269–287. [ PubMed ] Vollmer TR, Iwata BA, Zarcone JR, Smith RG, Mazaleski JL. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring; 26 (1):9–21. [ PubMed ] Vollmer TR, Progar PR, Lalli JS, Van Camp CM, Sierp BJ, Wright CS, Nastasi J, Eisenschink KJ. Fixed-time schedules attenuate extinction-induced phenomena in the treatment of severe aberrant behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter; 31 (4):529–542. [ PubMed ] Laport Ginna G, Levine Bruce L, Stadtmauer Edward A, Schuster Stephen J, Luger Selina M, Grupp Stephan, Bunin Nancy, Strobl Frank J, Cotte Julio, Zheng Zhaohui, Gregson Brian, Rivers Patricia, Vonderheide Robert H, Liebowitz David N, Porter David L, June Carl H. Adoptive transfer of costimulated T cells induces lymphocytosis in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma following CD34+-selected hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2003 Sep 15; 102 (6):2004–2013. [ PubMed ]
