首页    期刊浏览 2024年08月31日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The Selection of High-impact Health Informatics Literature: A Comparison of Results between the Content Expert and the Expert Searcher
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Elizabeth C. Whipple ; Julie J. McGowan ; Brian E. Dixon
  • 期刊名称:Journal of the Medical Library Association
  • 印刷版ISSN:1536-5050
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:97
  • 期号:03
  • DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.010
  • 出版社:Medical Library Association
  • 摘要:

    Background:
    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) created the Health IT Bibliography that contains peer-reviewed articles in eleven different health informatics categories. To create the bibliography, informatics experts identified what they considered the seminal articles in each category.
    Methods:
    Using the same eleven categories, an expert searcher (librarian) compiled a list of the “best” health informatics articles using information seeking and retrieval tools. The two sets of articles were then compared using high citation counts as a measure of value.
    Results:
    The expert searcher set (8,230) contained more than 3 times the citations to chosen articles compared to the content expert set (2,382). Of 60 articles, 27% of those articles (n=16) were included in both sets. The frequently cited journals were similar for both sets, and one-third of the same authors were cited in both sets.
    Discussion:
    While citation counts and the timeliness of the articles differed in the two sets, the same authors and same journals were frequently present in both sets.
    Conclusion:
    A best practice for locating high-quality articles may be collaboration between expert searchers and content experts.

  • 关键词:Health Informatics;Literature;Healthcare Research;National Resources;information seeking
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有