首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月29日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:An adjusting-dose procedure to identify the optimal reinforcing dose of nitrous oxide
  • 作者:Brian D. Kangas
  • 期刊名称:Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin (EAHB Bulletin)
  • 电子版ISSN:1938-7237
  • 出版年度:2007
  • 卷号:25
  • 出版社:Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Special Interest Group
  • 摘要:Despite continued abuse, there is a paucity in empirical investigations on inhalants as reinforcers. The present study attempted to derive a method for studying the reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) with human participants. An adjusting-dose procedure was employed to assess choice allocation for inhalation periods of varying doses of N2O. After experiencing the experimental parameters in forced choice trials, participants made choices between a fixed dose of 0% N2O (i.e., 100% O2) and an adjusting dose of N2O (0-50% N2O in O2). The adjusting dose titrated as a function of the participant抯 choices. Specifically, if the participant chose the adjusting dose in both free-choice trials, the adjusting dose was increased in the subsequent trial block. If the participant chose the fixed dose of 0% N2O in both free-choice trials, the adjusting dose was decreased in the subsequent trial block. If the participant chose one of each, the adjusting dose remained the same in the subsequent trial block. Conditions were run to stability and systematically replicated within-subject. Stable choice allocation served as both the chief dependent variable and an indication of the optimal reinforcing dose of N2O for that participant. Consistent with previous research on N2O, there was between-subject variability in the reinforcing effects of N2O; however, stable within-subject choice allocation was observed for 6 out of 8 participants. This method of assessing drug choice in humans allows for the testing of multiple doses within-subject, which is imperative, given that the reinforcing effects of drugs are known to vary across subjects and as a function of dose.
Loading...
联系我们|关于我们|网站声明
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有