首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月03日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:A Comparison of Differential Scoring Methods For Multiple Choice Tests in Terms of Classical Test and Item Response Theories
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Göksu Gözen Çıtak
  • 期刊名称:Ilköğretim-Online
  • 印刷版ISSN:1305-3515
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:9
  • 期号:01
  • 页码:170-187
  • 出版社:Ilköğretim-Online
  • 摘要:The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of binary (1-0) scoring, judgement-based (a priori) option weighting and empirical option weighting on the reliability and validity of a multiple-choice test regarding Classical Test and Item Response theories. Data were collected through the administration of a multiplechoice test of verbal ability to 1593 students attending several departments at Hacettepe and Gazi Universities. Research findings showed that regarding Item Response Theory, “1-0“ scoring estimates the parameters within different intervals on the ability scale more precisely than weighted scoring and binary scoring is superior to weighted scoring in terms of validity. In case of Classical Test Theory, results indicated that empirical option weighting estimates the highest reliability and all scoring methods cause an identical effect on test validity.
  • 关键词:multiple choice tests, partial credit model, scoring methods, option weighting
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有