期刊名称：Departmental Discussion Papers / University of Glasgow, Department of Economics
出版年度：2002
卷号：1
出版社：University of Glasgow, Department of Economics
摘要：Controversy remains over the degree of hypothetical bias in contingent valutation method
(CVM) estimates of values for public goods, especially for public goods with significant
passive-use values. This paper uses an “indifferent voter” approach to calibrate stated WTP
for a proposed public good increase with actual WTP implied by voting and tax liability data.
Our data are from a CVM survey and an actual voting decision on propositions to increase
public funds for landscape amenities protection in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland
