首页    期刊浏览 2025年06月10日 星期二
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Progressivity comparisons
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Valentino Dardoni ; Peter J. Lambert
  • 期刊名称:IFS Working Papers / Institute for Fiscal Studies London
  • 电子版ISSN:1742-0415
  • 出版年度:2000
  • 卷号:2000
  • 期号:1
  • DOI:doi: 10.1920/wp.ifs.2000.0018
  • 出版社:Institute for Fiscal Studies London
  • 摘要:Analysts should correct for distributional differences before undertaking local progressivity comparisons between income tax or tax and benefit schedules. A transplant-and-compare procedure is advocated, involving 'importation' of the schedule from one regime into another, or from both into a reference scenario. The residual progression ordering over transplanted schedules then assures a global ordering of original regimes by Lorenz or Suits curves. The algorithm is advocated for use only when transplantation functions are isoelastic, and is illustrated for the Canadian, Israeli and UK tax and benefit systems.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有